Frank Stronach Found Guilty of Sexual Assault and Indecent Assault in Ontario Court 
New Zealand Fast-Tracks Gold Mining as Industry Revival Gains Momentum 
DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll Over Alleged Perjury 
US Dollar Hits One-Year High as Hawkish Fed Outlook Overshadows Middle East Developments 
Japan, U.S. Discuss Yen Weakness as Currency Intervention Concerns Grow 
UNAIDS Urges U.S. to Reconsider South Africa HIV Funding Withdrawal 
Baseten Secures $1.5 Billion Funding at $13 Billion Valuation Amid AI Infrastructure Boom 
U.S. Supreme Court to Review Trump Administration Appeal on Immigrant Detention Without Bond Hearings 
US Tightens AI Chip Export Rules, Impacting Nvidia and AMD Sales to Chinese Firms 
Trump Administration Plans Deportation of Iranian Migrants to Central African Republic Under New Third-Country Deal 
NTSB Investigates Boston Logan Airport Near-Miss Between Delta and American Airlines Jets 
Venezuela Deploys Troops to Crack Down on Illegal Gold Mining Amid Push for Foreign Investment 
US Senate Approves War Powers Resolution Urging Trump to End Iran Military Action 
US Appeals Court Keeps Trump’s 10% Global Tariff in Effect During Ongoing Legal Battle 
Ryan Cohen Rejects GameStop Pay Package, Prepares New eBay Acquisition Plan 
Brazil Supreme Court Convicts Eduardo Bolsonaro Over U.S. Lobbying Efforts 
Malaysia Central Bank Moves to Support Ringgit Amid Foreign Fund Outflows 
When Donald Trump announced sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs in April, Learning Resources CEO Rick Woldenberg quickly began searching for legal support to challenge the move. Determined to protect his family’s decades-old educational toy business, Woldenberg joined forces with Akin Gump attorneys to take their case, Learning Resources v. Trump, to the U.S. Supreme Court. The case, along with two others—one filed by Democratic-led states and another by the Liberty Justice Center representing small firms like MicroKits and V.O.S. Selections—argues that Trump’s tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) exceed presidential authority.
Trump’s tariffs, ranging from 10% to 50%, have generated about $100 billion for the U.S. but hit small businesses hardest. Large corporations have largely stayed out of the litigation, opting instead for lobbying and exemption strategies. According to economist John Horn of Washington University, major firms can absorb tariff shocks through larger cash reserves and flexible supply chains, while smaller firms face crippling uncertainty and higher costs.
For Woldenberg, the tariffs forced drastic cutbacks, including canceling a 600,000-square-foot expansion, freezing hiring plans, and slashing marketing budgets. “I predicted we’d be smaller and make less money—and both are true,” he said. MicroKits founder David Levi shared similar struggles. His small Virginia-based toy company saw growth stall after tariffs on Chinese imports surged above 100%, forcing him to cut production and staff hours. With key electronic parts unavailable domestically, Levi says U.S. manufacturing remains unrealistic.
Liberty Justice Center attorney Jeffrey Schwab said the response from small businesses nationwide has been “overwhelming.” Victor Schwartz, president of V.O.S. Selections, said his wine import business lost $200,000 due to the tariffs, calling his participation in the lawsuit a “moral imperative.” As the Supreme Court hears arguments, small businesses hope for a ruling that restores stability and fairness to U.S. trade policy.
