Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
NEW YORK, Oct. 04, 2017 -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on behalf of investors who purchased Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. ("Rayonier") (NYSE:RYAM) securities between October 29, 2014 and August 19, 2015.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sbm/rayonier-advanced-materials-inc?wire=3. There is no cost or obligation to you.
The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that since 2013, one of Rayonier’s top customers, Eastman Chemical Company, had been informing Rayonier of its competitors’ pricing and had requested that Rayonier respond to declines in market pricing, leading to a protracted dispute between Rayonier and Eastman over the “meet and release” provision of their agreement. Nevertheless, Rayonier claimed during the Class Period that in 2015 it would “be able to maintain or increase [its] share of volume at each of [its] top 10 customers.” When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
If you suffered a loss in Rayonier you have until October 16, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sbm/rayonier-advanced-materials-inc?wire=3.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]
