In 2010, a small study was conducted regarding certain poses that are supposed to exude confidence and power, which resulted in researchers trumpeting the merits of so-called “power poses.” Unfortunately, a new study suggests that this is not only ineffective, it can also backfire on the ones doing the poses.
The 2010 study failed to produce expected results when it was finally done on a large scale in 2015, Slate reports. At this point, the research was already hailed as a huge inspiration for those who are lacking in confidence, even getting 36 million views on YouTube when the findings were presented during a TED Talk.
As it turns out, the methodology used during the 2010 study were quite flawed and the scale of the research was far too limited to have been blown out of proportion as it was. Because of this, the lead author of the study, Dana Carney disavowed the research and its results.
Unfortunately, the misunderstandings caused by the publication and widespread misinformation regarding the research remains even today. Just to make the matter absolutely clear, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania conducted a study looking into power poses and concluded that it actually achieves the opposite of the desired effect.
One of the researchers behind the study is Coren Apicella, MedixalXpress reports, and she said that power posing for the sake of appearing strong has a negative effect on the hormones that provide such a state. Specifically, testosterone.
"We did find that if anything—and we're skeptical of these results because we'd want to replicate them—that, if you're a loser and you take a winner or high power pose, your testosterone decreases," Apicella said.
“Losers” is, of course, a coarse way of describing individuals who have limited self-esteem and self-confidence. Even so, the point still remains. If the subject does not naturally feel powerful, no amount of power-posing is going to help.


Disaster or digital spectacle? The dangers of using floods to create social media content
Gold Prices Fall Amid Rate Jitters; Copper Steady as China Stimulus Eyed
Why a ‘rip-off’ degree might be worth the money after all – research study
Trump’s "Shock and Awe" Agenda: Executive Orders from Day One
U.S. Stocks vs. Bonds: Are Diverging Valuations Signaling a Shift?
The pandemic is still disrupting young people’s careers
Gold Prices Slide as Rate Cut Prospects Diminish; Copper Gains on China Stimulus Hopes
S&P 500 Relies on Tech for Growth in Q4 2024, Says Barclays
Columbia Student Mahmoud Khalil Fights Arrest as Deportation Case Moves to New Jersey
What’s the difference between baking powder and baking soda? It’s subtle, but significant
Debate over H-1B visas shines spotlight on US tech worker shortages
US Futures Rise as Investors Eye Earnings, Inflation Data, and Wildfire Impacts
Britain has almost 1 million young people not in work or education – here’s what evidence shows can change that
Bank of America Posts Strong Q4 2024 Results, Shares Rise
U.S. Treasury Yields Expected to Decline Amid Cooling Economic Pressures 



