Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape 
Anta Sports Expands Global Footprint With Strategic Puma Stake 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
Samsung Electronics Shares Jump on HBM4 Mass Production Report 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
NEW YORK, Sept. 08, 2017 -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on behalf of investors who purchased MAXIMUS, Inc. ("Maximus") (NYSE:MMS) securities between October 30, 2014 and February 3, 2016.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sb/maximus-inc?wire=3. There is no cost or obligation to you.
According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, the Company issued materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) in obtaining the HAAS contract, Maximus set an unattainable target number of healthcare professionals to recruit and an unattainable target number of assessments; (ii) throughout the HAAS contract, Maximus was struggling to recruit, train and ramp-up new health care staff to perform the assessments; (iii) the inability to meet its target number of healthcare recruits and target number of assessments meant Maximus would not earn the performance-based incentive fees from the HAAS contract; and (iv) consequently, Defendants’ statements about the Company, its financial condition, and the outlook for its business, lacked a reasonable basis when made.
If you suffered a loss in Maximus you have until October 6, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sb/maximus-inc?wire=3.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]
