Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
SpaceX Pivots Toward Moon City as Musk Reframes Long-Term Space Vision 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Innovent Biologics Shares Rally on New Eli Lilly Oncology and Immunology Deal 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins 
Samsung Electronics Shares Jump on HBM4 Mass Production Report 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
IRVINE, Calif., Aug. 23, 2017 -- Khang & Khang LLP (the “Firm”) announces a securities class action lawsuit against Lexmark International Inc. (“Lexmark” or the “Company”) (NYSE: LXK). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Lexmark shares between August 1, 2014 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the Firm in advance of the September 19, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline.
If you purchased Lexmark shares during the Class Period, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., of Khang & Khang LLP, 4000 Barranca Parkway, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92604, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at [email protected].
There has been no class certification in this case yet. Until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may choose to take no action and remain a passive class member as well.
The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Lexmark made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose, that: end-user demand and growth for the Company’s supplies business was deteriorating; that pricing increases were the primary driver of supplies revenue growth, not end-user demand; that customers in the supplies channel reacted by buying ahead of anticipated pricing increases; and that as a result, there were excessive inventory levels at its European wholesale distributors.
On July 21, 2015, Lexmark reported poor results for its second quarter ending June 30, 2015 and lowered its 2015 sales guidance. The Company revealed its supplies growth was not attributable to end-user demand but rather the result of its European customers buying ahead of customary price increases which produced excessive inventory. Following this news, Lexmark’s stock price dropped materially, which caused investors harm according to the Complaint.
If you wish to learn more about this lawsuit, or if you have any questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esquire, a prominent litigator for almost two decades, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or via e-mail at [email protected].
This press release may constitute Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions.
Contact Joon M. Khang, Esq. Telephone: 949-419-3834 Facsimile: 949-225-4474 [email protected]
