HiteJinro, a South Korean distiller company that makes soju and beer, is in hot water after it was allegedly caught changing the labels of its soju drink bottles. Local industry officials said that the company is doing this illegal act with the intention of misleading the consumers.
The officials said on Wednesday, Feb. 15, that HiteJinro replaced the labels of its Jinro Soju brand to make it appear that they are the brand's Zero Sugar version. In truth, the alcohol content of the drinks is 16.5% and definitely has some levels of sugar in them.
The Zero Sugar soju is said to be the newer type of clear alcoholic drink and has recently become very popular, especially in restaurants around Seoul. This has 16% of alcohol content, and it is different from the regular Jinro soju because their ingredients are not the same.
Moreover, The Korea Times reported that, unlike the original version, Zero Sugar has no fructose and only contains artificial sweeteners. This was created for drinkers who want to avoid sugar.
It was suggested that due to its rising popularity, the demand for the product is quite high, but the production may be slow. This may have prompted HiteJinro to just change the label to meet the demand and sell more since it has stocks of the original soju.
The publication mentioned that the act of putting on a false label on products is a clear violation of the country's Article 8 of the Act on Labeling and Advertising of Food. Offenders can end up in jail for up to five years or be fined up to KRW50 million or about $38,971.
Meanwhile, HiteJinro issued a statement regarding the allegation and denied it has intentionally changed the labels of its regular soju brand. The company explained that the mislabeling of the bottles was a complete mistake that was committed by its sales personnel who was working part-time.
HiteJinro further said the employee only replaced the front labels, and the back labels remained. This means that the information about ingredients that show sugar content was still displayed despite the error on the front label.
"We intended to change the labels only for sugar-free products as the previous one showed the 'Zero Sugar' phrase too small on the front label," a company official stated. "Our sales personnel didn't do it intentionally. It was a mistake."
Photo by: Javier Esteban/Unsplash


NATO Albania Summit Faces Uncertainty as Trump, Defense Spending Concerns Loom
Gold Price Hits Annual Low as Fed Rate Hike Bets and Sticky Inflation Weigh on Bullion
US Stock Futures Steady as Investors Await Payrolls Data and Monitor Iran Tensions
Nike Q4 Earnings Beat Estimates as Wholesale Growth Offsets Direct Sales Weakness
Gold Prices Drop as Fed Rate Outlook and Iran Tensions Weigh on Market
Global Financial Firms Shift Asia Expansion Focus to South Korea as China, India Face Caution
Asian Currencies Stay Range-Bound as Investors Eye China Data, RBNZ Outlook and U.S.-Iran Ceasefire
Firmus Partners With Nvidia to Deliver 170,000 AI GPUs in $30 Billion Cloud Infrastructure Deal
Europe Heatwave Creates Growth Opportunity for Carrier, Trane, and Johnson Controls, Citi Says
Trump Urges Gasoline Retailers to Cut Prices to $2.50 Per Gallon, Warns of Legal Action
Argentina Economy Shrinks 1.5% in April, Recovery Under Milei Loses Momentum
Asian Stocks Slip as US-Iran Ceasefire Hopes Lift Oil, Dollar Strength Persists
Canada Grants C$7 Million to Greenland Molybdenum Mine to Strengthen Critical Minerals Supply
RBA Minutes Signal Australia Central Bank Remains Ready to Raise Interest Rates if Inflation Persists
UBS Raises TSMC Price Target to T$3,400 on Strong AI Chip Demand Outlook
Morgan Stanley Raises Tesla Q2 Delivery Forecast on Strong Europe and China Demand
China Manufacturing PMI Edges Higher in June as Exports and AI Investment Boost Growth 



