HiteJinro, a South Korean distiller company that makes soju and beer, is in hot water after it was allegedly caught changing the labels of its soju drink bottles. Local industry officials said that the company is doing this illegal act with the intention of misleading the consumers.
The officials said on Wednesday, Feb. 15, that HiteJinro replaced the labels of its Jinro Soju brand to make it appear that they are the brand's Zero Sugar version. In truth, the alcohol content of the drinks is 16.5% and definitely has some levels of sugar in them.
The Zero Sugar soju is said to be the newer type of clear alcoholic drink and has recently become very popular, especially in restaurants around Seoul. This has 16% of alcohol content, and it is different from the regular Jinro soju because their ingredients are not the same.
Moreover, The Korea Times reported that, unlike the original version, Zero Sugar has no fructose and only contains artificial sweeteners. This was created for drinkers who want to avoid sugar.
It was suggested that due to its rising popularity, the demand for the product is quite high, but the production may be slow. This may have prompted HiteJinro to just change the label to meet the demand and sell more since it has stocks of the original soju.
The publication mentioned that the act of putting on a false label on products is a clear violation of the country's Article 8 of the Act on Labeling and Advertising of Food. Offenders can end up in jail for up to five years or be fined up to KRW50 million or about $38,971.
Meanwhile, HiteJinro issued a statement regarding the allegation and denied it has intentionally changed the labels of its regular soju brand. The company explained that the mislabeling of the bottles was a complete mistake that was committed by its sales personnel who was working part-time.
HiteJinro further said the employee only replaced the front labels, and the back labels remained. This means that the information about ingredients that show sugar content was still displayed despite the error on the front label.
"We intended to change the labels only for sugar-free products as the previous one showed the 'Zero Sugar' phrase too small on the front label," a company official stated. "Our sales personnel didn't do it intentionally. It was a mistake."
Photo by: Javier Esteban/Unsplash


Russian Stocks End Mixed as MOEX Index Closes Flat Amid Commodity Strength
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Dow Hits 50,000 as U.S. Stocks Stage Strong Rebound Amid AI Volatility
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
Fed Governor Lisa Cook Warns Inflation Risks Remain as Rates Stay Steady
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
Dollar Steadies Ahead of ECB and BoE Decisions as Markets Turn Risk-Off
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
RBI Holds Repo Rate at 5.25% as India’s Growth Outlook Strengthens After U.S. Trade Deal
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning
Bank of Japan Signals Readiness for Near-Term Rate Hike as Inflation Nears Target
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions
South Korea’s Weak Won Struggles as Retail Investors Pour Money Into U.S. Stocks 



