In a recent legal maneuver, Google, according to court documents filed late Thursday, has petitioned to reverse a jury decision that concluded the company had exercised monopolistic practices within its Play Store.
Reuters reported that the tech behemoth's legal request implores U.S. District Judge James Donato in San Francisco to either grant a new trial or deliver a ruling favorable to Google in the ongoing antitrust legal battle initiated by Epic Games.
Google Challenges Verdict's Foundation
The filing reveals that Google contends Epic Games failed to provide sufficient proof to underpin the jury's December finding, which declared Google's restrictive control over its Play Store anti-competitive. Moreover, Google insists on its vigorous competition with rival Apple in the mobile app sphere, asserting that Epic should not have been permitted to claim the contrary.
The Path to Reforming Play Store
Initiating litigation in 2020, Epic Games targeted Google's contentious app transaction fees and the mechanisms governing app distribution. While not seeking monetary reparations, Epic Games' lawsuit is geared towards compelling alterations to the Play Store's operational framework.
The Hindu reported that Epic Games anticipates soliciting a directive from Judge Donato to restructure Play, aligning it with the jury's conclusions. Epic, headquartered in Cary, North Carolina, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
If Judge Donato dismisses the motion for a retrial, Google stands prepared to contest the December verdict before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Ahead of the trial against Epic Games, Google concluded ancillary claims stemming from consumers and states with a $700 million settlement, conceding to measures that promise increased competitive conditions.
Parallel to Google's legal strife, Epic Games has also engaged Apple in a separate lawsuit regarding App Store regulations. Apple largely emerged victorious from the 2021 legal proceedings. However, it was mandated to implement certain modifications to its storefront. Epic Games announced plans to seek judicial enforcement again, citing Apple's non-compliance.
In defense of its stance, Google argued that the outcome of Epic's previous lawsuit against Apple should have been admissible information during its litigation.
Photo: Joshua Hoehne/Unsplash


SpaceX Edges Toward Landmark IPO as Elon Musk Confirms Plans
Moore Threads Stock Slides After Risk Warning Despite 600% Surge Since IPO
Trump’s Approval of AI Chip Sales to China Triggers Bipartisan National Security Concerns
Australia Enforces World-First Social Media Age Limit as Global Regulation Looms
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand
SK Hynix Considers U.S. ADR Listing to Boost Shareholder Value Amid Rising AI Chip Demand
SoftBank Shares Slide as Oracle’s AI Spending Plans Fuel Market Jitters
SUPERFORTUNE Launches AI-Powered Mobile App, Expanding Beyond Web3 Into $392 Billion Metaphysics Market
SpaceX Insider Share Sale Values Company Near $800 Billion Amid IPO Speculation
Nvidia Weighs Expanding H200 AI Chip Production as China Demand Surges
Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Sparks Global Debate and Early Challenges
noyb Files GDPR Complaints Against TikTok, Grindr, and AppsFlyer Over Alleged Illegal Data Tracking.
Microsoft Unveils Massive Global AI Investments, Prioritizing India’s Rapidly Growing Digital Market
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 



