Brazil to Phase Out Gasoline Subsidy First as Diesel Support Stays Longer 
Gold Price Holds Above $4,000 as Fed Rate Hike Expectations and U.S. Jobs Data Weigh on Market 
Denmark Central Bank Intervenes to Support Krone Peg Against Euro 
Taiwan Central Bank Likely to Keep Interest Rates Unchanged Through 2027 
Oil Prices Steady as U.S.-Iran Talks Ease Supply Fears Ahead of Holiday Weekend 
USA at 250: the Black American struggle for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness 
Central Banks Eye Gold, Reduce Dollar Exposure as AI Adoption Accelerates: OMFIF Survey 
Alcohol is one of the most dangerous drugs, yet its presence is ubiquitous in social settings and celebrations 
Trump has made more than $1 billion from crypto in a year. How? 
BOJ Hawk Signals Faster Interest Rate Hikes Amid Inflation Risks 
ECB Set to Raise Interest Rates as Energy Shock Fuels Eurozone Inflation Concerns 
US Dollar Rises as Fed Rate Outlook Stays Hawkish, Euro Slips and Yen Near 40-Year Low 
Numerous elements that influence the shift in the SNB’s FX stance, namely:
1) Economic performance is satisfactory and inflation continues to normalize (the rate of CPI inflation has increased by 1.5% from the 2015 low, putting it 0.4% above its 5Y average.
2) The SNB’s FX and gold reserves increased by 17% of GDP in 2016 to 114%. The SNB needs to be mindful of the fiscal risk inherent in a balance sheet of this size, especially considering potential investment losses from a trend to higher bond yields.
3) The Trump Administration is less accepting of FX manipulation. But what has US FX policy got to do with a small economy like Switzerland? The answer is that while small, Switzerland has a long and enduring history of FX intervention such that it is now the third largest holder of FX reserves (6% of global reserves for an economy which accounts for 0.9% of global GDP) and the fourth largest holder of UST (excluding offshore centres). Importantly also, Switzerland is one of only two countries that exceeds the threshold the US Treasury has set as prima facie evidence of currency manipulation -persistent, one-sided FX intervention exceeding 2% of GDP (Switzerland is at 10%, Taiwan 2.5%).
SNB intervention may be regarded as a legitimate expression of domestic monetary policy by some observers, but could equally be construed as manipulation by others. In view of this, it’s not an entirely fanciful suggestion that the SNB might be tapering intervention in order to the guard against the risk of being cited by the US Treasury as a currency manipulator.
Bullish scenarios:
1) The SNB continues to taper but at a faster pace.
2) The US Treasury cites Switzerland as a currency manipulator (April report?).
3) President Le Pen.
Bearish scenarios:
1) 3-4 Fed hikes encourages heavier capital outflows and a resumption of CHF funded carry trades.
2) Breakdown of EU talks over restrictions on free movement of labor.
