Visa Wins China Approval to Prepare Domestic Payments Expansion 
Cardano Hits Five-Year Transaction Record as ADA Price Falls 
Bitcoin Price Drops as US Dollar Hits 18-Month High 
S&P 500 Rally Masks Losses for Over 40% of Stocks in 2026 
Philippines Current Account Deficit Seen at $19.1 Billion in 2026 
Nasdaq Faces Pullback to 26,225 Despite Bullish Outlook, UBS Says 
Global Stocks Mixed as Oil Falls Ahead of US Earnings 
Wall Street Ends Mixed as Investors Await CPI and Bank Earnings 
DeFi Development Adds 22,070 SOL to Solana Treasury 
Fed’s Hammack Says More Data Needed Before Next Rate Move 
Asian Stocks Plunge as AI Chip Selloff Hits South Korea and Japan 
Samsung, SK Hynix Shares Plunge as China Chip Competition Grows 
RBA Hikes Interest Rate to 4.60% as Inflation Risks Rise 
US Stock Futures Rise as Oil Prices Fall Ahead of Q3 Earnings 
XRP Ledger Foundation Confirms 100B Supply Safe After Security Fix 
Gold Prices Rebound as Dollar Weakens Ahead of US Inflation Data 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Numerous elements that influence the shift in the SNB’s FX stance, namely:
1) Economic performance is satisfactory and inflation continues to normalize (the rate of CPI inflation has increased by 1.5% from the 2015 low, putting it 0.4% above its 5Y average.
2) The SNB’s FX and gold reserves increased by 17% of GDP in 2016 to 114%. The SNB needs to be mindful of the fiscal risk inherent in a balance sheet of this size, especially considering potential investment losses from a trend to higher bond yields.
3) The Trump Administration is less accepting of FX manipulation. But what has US FX policy got to do with a small economy like Switzerland? The answer is that while small, Switzerland has a long and enduring history of FX intervention such that it is now the third largest holder of FX reserves (6% of global reserves for an economy which accounts for 0.9% of global GDP) and the fourth largest holder of UST (excluding offshore centres). Importantly also, Switzerland is one of only two countries that exceeds the threshold the US Treasury has set as prima facie evidence of currency manipulation -persistent, one-sided FX intervention exceeding 2% of GDP (Switzerland is at 10%, Taiwan 2.5%).
SNB intervention may be regarded as a legitimate expression of domestic monetary policy by some observers, but could equally be construed as manipulation by others. In view of this, it’s not an entirely fanciful suggestion that the SNB might be tapering intervention in order to the guard against the risk of being cited by the US Treasury as a currency manipulator.
Bullish scenarios:
1) The SNB continues to taper but at a faster pace.
2) The US Treasury cites Switzerland as a currency manipulator (April report?).
3) President Le Pen.
Bearish scenarios:
1) 3-4 Fed hikes encourages heavier capital outflows and a resumption of CHF funded carry trades.
2) Breakdown of EU talks over restrictions on free movement of labor.
