Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses 
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis 
San Francisco Suspect Arrested After Molotov Cocktail Attack on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's Home 
OpenAI Addresses Security Vulnerability in macOS App Certification Process 
Abbott Laboratories Ordered to Pay $53 Million in Premature Infant Formula Lawsuit 
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization 
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict 
Disney Plans to Cut 1,000 Jobs Amid Ongoing Restructuring Efforts 
Goldman Sachs, ANZ Cut Oil Forecasts Amid U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Hopes 
Pony.ai, Uber, and Verne Launch Europe's First Commercial Robotaxi Service in Zagreb 
Ford Issues Major Recall on Over 422,000 Vehicles Due to Windshield Wiper Defect 
Anthropic Fights Pentagon Blacklisting in Dual Federal Court Battles 
MATCH Act: How New U.S. Chip Legislation Could Freeze China's Semiconductor Ambitions 
Pershing Square Bids €30.40 Per Share to Acquire Universal Music Group in $9.4B Deal 
Rio Tinto's California Boron Assets Attract Over a Dozen Bidders, Valued at Up to $2 Billion 
Chalco Stock Surges as Q1 2025 Profit Forecast Jumps Up to 58% 
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Posts Strong Q3 Earnings, Announces AI-Driven Job Cuts 
LOS ANGELES, Aug. 22, 2017 -- Lundin Law PC, a shareholder rights firm, announces a class action lawsuit against Lexmark International, Inc. (“Lexmark” or the “Company”) (NYSE:LXK) concerning possible violations of federal securities laws between August 1, 2014 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares during the Class Period should contact the firm prior to the September 19, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline.
To participate in this class action lawsuit, click here.
You can also call Brian Lundin, Esq., of Lundin Law PC, at 888-713-1033, or you can e-mail him at [email protected].
No class has been certified in the above action yet. Until a class is certified, you are not considered represented by an attorney. You may choose to do nothing and be an absent class member as well.
According to the Complaint, throughout the Class Period, Lexmark made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose, that: end-user demand and growth for the Company’s supplies business was deteriorating; that pricing increases were the primary driver of supplies revenue growth, not end-user demand; that customers in the supplies channel reacted by buying ahead of anticipated pricing increases; and that as a result, there were excessive inventory levels at its European wholesale distributors. On July 21, 2015, Lexmark reported poor results for its second quarter ending June 30, 2015 and lowered its 2015 sales guidance. The Company revealed its supplies growth was not attributable to end-user demand but rather the result of its European customers buying ahead of customary price increases which produced excessive inventory. Following this news, shares of Lexmark dropped in value materially, which caused investors harm according to the Complaint.
Lundin Law PC was established by Brian Lundin, Esq., a securities litigator based in Los Angeles dedicated to upholding shareholders’ rights.
This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethics rules.
Contact: Lundin Law PC Brian Lundin, Esq. Telephone: 888-713-1033 Facsimile: 888-713-1125 [email protected] http://lundinlawpc.com/
