Since departing from the White House in January, former President Donald Trump has been living at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida full-time. However, as many locals have brought up the agreement he made in 1993, the Palm Beach Council will not conduct a review as to whether Trump will now be allowed to reside there.
The town council of Palm Beach is undergoing a deliberation to decide whether Trump can stay at his Mar-a-Lago resort full time. This is despite Trump facing an impeachment trial before the Senate this week. The council will hear from the attorney’s opinion on whether it can stop Trump from residing in his club due to the 1993 agreement Trump made with the town. The agreement was that Trump cannot reside in the town should he convert Mar-a-Lago from a residence to a resort.
The agreement was brought up when a neighbor in the area through an attorney sent a letter to the council demanding that the former president stop living at the resort. The neighbor cited that the former president actively residing at Mar-a-Lago would lower property values in the area.
It should be noted that Trump is technically an employee of the corporation that owns Mar-a-Lago and the written agreement only states that members are not allowed to live there. Via the town’s regulations, the club can provide onsite housing to employees. Trump returns to being an employee after leaving office last January 20. Trump and former first lady Melania Trump have since changed their voting address to Mar-a-Lago back in 2019 and have been voting in the state.
Aside from the possibility that Trump may not be allowed to reside in Mar-a-Lago full time, Trump was recently issued a permanent ban from SAG-AFTRA. The organization’s National Board announced that they passed a resolution permanently barring Trump from re-applying for membership in the union. This was in light of Trump’s involvement during the January 6 riots at the Capitol that led to the union to discuss disciplinary action. This also led to Trump issuing a resignation letter upon receiving a threat of getting kicked out.
“Preventing Donald Trump from ever rejoining SAG-AFTRA is more than a symbolic step. It is a resounding statement that threatening or inciting harm against fellow members will not be tolerated. An attack against one is an attack against all,” said SAG-AFTRA president Gabrielle Carteris in a statement.


Judge Delays SEC Settlement With Elon Musk Over Twitter Stock Disclosure Case
TikTok Nears $400 Million Settlement With Trump Administration Over Child Privacy Lawsuit
Germany Rejects Putin’s Proposal for Schroeder to Mediate Ukraine Peace Talks
Trump Credits Belarus Prisoner Release in U.S.-Backed Swap
Russia Accuses Ukraine of Ceasefire Violations Amid Drone and Artillery Attacks
US Auto Industry Urges Trump to Block Chinese EV Market Access
Trump Announces Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire for May 9-11 Amid Ongoing Peace Talks
Delcy Rodriguez Appears at ICJ Hearing Over Venezuela-Guyana Esequibo Dispute
Trump Rejects Iran Proposal as Strait of Hormuz Crisis Pushes Oil Prices Higher
Senate Stablecoin Bill Sparks Clash Between Banks and Crypto Industry
Qatar Condemns Drone Strike as Iran Conflict Threatens Gulf Shipping and Global Markets
Trump-Xi Summit Sparks Renewed Hope for Americans Detained in China
Ukraine-Russia Ceasefire Confirmed as Prisoner Swap Deal Advances
Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum Reconsiders Early School Closure Plan Ahead of 2026 World Cup
Taiwan Confident in Strong U.S. Relations Ahead of Trump-Xi China Summit
Keir Starmer Faces Leadership Pressure as Labour Turns Toward Europe 



