Trump Attends Super Bowl Amid Cheers, Boos, and Political Divide 
Trump Threatens Stadium Deal Over Washington Commanders Name 
OpenAI Moves to Acquire Neptune as It Expands AI Training Capabilities 
Tesla Faces 19% Drop in UK Registrations as Competition Intensifies 
Asian Currencies Steady as Markets Await Fed Rate Decision; Indian Rupee Hits New Record Low 
Bolsonaro Detained Over Alleged Escape Risk After Ankle Monitor Tampering 
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit 
GM Issues Recall for 2026 Chevrolet Silverado Trucks Over Missing Owner Manuals 
Brazil’s Supreme Court Orders Jair Bolsonaro to Begin 27-Year Prison Term 
UN General Assembly Demands Russia Return Ukrainian Children Amid Ongoing Conflict 
Bolsonaro Blames Medication Mix-Up for Ankle Monitor Tampering as Detention Continues 
Asian Markets Mixed as RBI Cuts Rates and BOJ Signals Possible Hike 
Europe Confronts Rising Competitive Pressure as China Accelerates Export-Led Growth 
Why the Australian Open’s online tennis coverage looks like a Wii sports game 
Meta Accused of Halting Internal Research on Mental Health Risks of Facebook and Instagram 
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature 
The Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of a website accused of selling ‘first copy’ of popular footwear brands like Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Louis Vuitton at highly discounted prices.
In an order, Justice Navin Chawla also sought details and KYC documents of three mobile numbers through which the website ‘www.myshoeshop.in’ was allegedly offering the goods.
The court also ordered the suspension of the Instagram page of the website and asked for details of its owner.
The order was passed on a commercial suit filed by US-based manufacturer, New Balance Athletics Inc, who accused ‘Ashok Kumar Trading’ of selling counterfeits of its footwear and also that of other well-known brands.
The court said that New Balance has made out a prima facie case for grant of an injunction and the balance of convenience also lies in its favor.
It added that an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff and consumers if the defendant is not restrained from continuing with their web portal.
The court had ordered the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days. The case is set for hearing on November 9.
