Apple Eyes U.S. Formula 1 Broadcast Rights in Major Sports Streaming Push 
‘The geezer game’ – a nearly 50-year-old pickup basketball game – reveals its secrets to longevity 
Trump Set to Announce Washington D.C. as Host of 2027 NFL Draft 
NBA Returns to China with Alibaba Partnership and Historic Macau Games 
Trump Claims Pardon for Tina Peters Despite No Legal Authority 
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform 
Federal Judge Orders Restoration of SEVIS Status for Tufts PhD Student Rumeysa Ozturk 
Trump Attends Super Bowl Amid Cheers, Boos, and Political Divide 
ANZ Faces Legal Battle as Former CEO Shayne Elliott Sues Over A$13.5 Million Bonus Dispute 
Trump Plans UFC Event at White House for America’s 250th Anniversary 
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant 
Why is soccer fandom so linked to violence? 
Asian Technology and Chipmaking Stocks Slide as AI Spending Concerns Shake Markets 
Bolivia’s Ex-President Luis Arce Detained in Embezzlement Probe 
Native American Groups Slam Trump’s Call to Restore Redskins Name 
The Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of a website accused of selling ‘first copy’ of popular footwear brands like Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Louis Vuitton at highly discounted prices.
In an order, Justice Navin Chawla also sought details and KYC documents of three mobile numbers through which the website ‘www.myshoeshop.in’ was allegedly offering the goods.
The court also ordered the suspension of the Instagram page of the website and asked for details of its owner.
The order was passed on a commercial suit filed by US-based manufacturer, New Balance Athletics Inc, who accused ‘Ashok Kumar Trading’ of selling counterfeits of its footwear and also that of other well-known brands.
The court said that New Balance has made out a prima facie case for grant of an injunction and the balance of convenience also lies in its favor.
It added that an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff and consumers if the defendant is not restrained from continuing with their web portal.
The court had ordered the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days. The case is set for hearing on November 9.
