Xiaomi may be allowed to do business again in the U.S. after the country’s federal court stopped the government from prohibiting the Americans from investing in the company. This means that the restrictions against the Chinese smartphone-maker have been lifted.
The root of the ban
Under Donald Trump’s administration, Xiaomi was added to the list of companies that allegedly have ties with the Chinese military. It was the state’s Defense Department that included the tech company in the list, and this resulted in the then-president’s decision to impose financial restrictions on the company.
This prohibited businesses in the U.S. from investing and doing business with Chinese companies, including Xiaomi. This effectively blocked the smartphone manufacturer from selling or supplying its goods to U.S. clients.
Xiaomi wins in its lawsuit
However, on Friday, March 12, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras of Washington temporarily blocked the Defense Department from disallowing U.S. investments in Xiaomi. The judge just canceled the ban and clearly sided with the Chinese company in its lawsuit that aims to have its name removed from the blacklisted firms.
In his decision, Judge Contreras said that the move was “arbitrary and capricious” and visibly stripped Xiaomi of its rights to due process. As per Bloomberg, the judge added that Xiaomi is also most likely to win in the lawsuit and fully reverse the ban so it can start doing business again in the U.S.
The decision was also said to have been placed to prevent the company from suffering from further irreparable harm. This is because when the prohibition was initially announced, Xiaomi was faced with the likelihood of being de-listed from the U.S. stock exchange, which in turn will lead to its removal from global benchmark indexes. When this happens, it will be a big business disaster for the company.
Finally, The Wall Street Journal reported that Judge Contreras pointed out that being a technology company doesn’t suggest a link to the Chinese military. He said that “investment in technology does not necessarily equate to military link.” He further reasoned that the U.S. was not able to convincingly show that there is such a connection between Xiaomi and the Chinese army.
“Xiaomi is a publicly-traded company that produces commercial products for civilian use, is controlled by its independent board and controlling shareholders, and is not effectively controlled or associated with others under the ownership or control of the PRC or its security services,” he said.


Netflix Stock Slips After Earnings as Soft 2026 Guidance Overshadows Subscriber Milestone
OpenAI Launches Stargate Community Plan to Offset Energy Costs and Support Local Power Infrastructure
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer
Rio Tinto Posts Strong Q4 Iron Ore and Copper Output on Operational Recovery
Morgan Stanley Flags High Volatility Ahead for Tesla Stock on Robotaxi and AI Updates
Valero Makes First Venezuelan Crude Purchase Under New U.S.-Caracas Deal
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Plans China Visit Amid AI Chip Market Uncertainty
Valentino Garavani Dies at 93, Leaving Behind the Timeless Legacy of Valentino Red
Brazil Supreme Court Orders Asset Freeze of Nelson Tanure Amid Banco Master Investigation
BitGo IPO Prices Above Range, Raises $212.8M in Landmark Crypto Market Debut
Pop Mart Shares Surge in Hong Kong After First Buyback in Nearly Two Years
JPMorgan and Allen & Company Emerge as Big Winners in Warner Bros Discovery Bidding War
Renault Group Global Sales Rise 3.2% in 2025 on Strong International and EV Demand
Lululemon Founder Chip Wilson Escalates Proxy Fight to Remove Advent From Board
U.S. Vaccine Policy Shifts Under RFK Jr. Create Uncertainty for Pharma and Investors
Global DRAM Chip Shortage Puts Automakers Under New Cost and Supply Pressure
FSU Criticizes ANZ Over Suncorp Bank Job Cuts Amid Post-Acquisition Commitments 



