The large central banks reacted to the Brexit shock as they should react to quick risk-off moves: they affirmed that if necessary the liquidity supply would be ample. However, in the majority of G7 countries, the local currencies are already drowning in liquidity.
So what is more important for the banks is the confidence that they will still be able to access the USD liquidity of their domestic central banks which the latter get from swap lines with the Fed.
The majority of central banks are happy with conventional measures such as that, but not the SNB. During the Brexit night, the Swiss National Bank intervened.
After all, everyone is meant to realize that the Swiss central bank will not tolerate an excessive appreciation of the franc. And after all, that is not exactly a new feature of Swiss monetary policy.
Since the minimum exchange rate in EURCHF was abolished interventions have become part of the SNB’s everyday repertoire.
The only question that leaves is what the advantage of ending the minimum exchange rate might have been in that case. Certainly not a step towards with the SNB’s declared aim of limiting its balance sheet.


Morgan Stanley Raises KOSPI Target to 5,200 on Strong Earnings and Reform Momentum
RBA Deputy Governor Says November Inflation Slowdown Helpful but Still Above Target
Elon Musk’s Empire: SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI Merger Talks Spark Investor Debate
Morgan Stanley Flags High Volatility Ahead for Tesla Stock on Robotaxi and AI Updates
MAS Holds Monetary Policy Steady as Strong Growth Raises Inflation Risks
OCBC Raises Gold Price Forecast to $5,600 as Structural Demand and Uncertainty Persist
Why Trump’s new pick for Fed chair hit gold and silver markets – for good reasons
Bank of England Expected to Hold Interest Rates at 3.75% as Inflation Remains Elevated
New York Fed President John Williams Signals Rate Hold as Economy Seen Strong in 2026




