Turkey’s suppression of the Kurdish political movement continues to fuel a deadly armed conflict 
Who will Trump pick as his running mate? 
Georgia is sliding towards autocracy after government moves to force through bill on ‘foreign agents’ 
Joe Biden Proposes Record 44.6% Capital Gains Tax in Latest Budget Plan That May Favor Cryptocurrencies 
Rishi Sunak wants to cut the cost of ‘sicknote’ Britain 
US and Japan Boost AI, Semiconductor Alliance; EU Eyes Reduction in China Dependence 
China's Commerce Minister to Advocate EV Sector in Europe Amid Subsidy, Tariff Probe 
Nvidia RTX 4090D Embroiled in US-China Tech Rivalry; South Korea Navigates Chip Export Dilemma 
US election: two graphs show how young voters influence presidential results as Biden gets poll boost 
US Finalizes Ban List for Chinese Chipmakers; Boosts Mexico Semiconductor Ties 
South Korean President Yoon faces foreign policy challenges after the National Assembly election 
The politics stopping the UK from opening a youth mobility scheme with Europe 
The 50th anniversary of Portugal’s Carnation Revolution 
President Donald Trump is someone who demands absolute loyalty, or someone who agrees with him all the time. Recently, the President announced that they were going to sue the New York Times for libel on the opinion piece regarding Russian relations.
Trump is suing the publication for supposed defamation as they reportedly made a false report that there was a connection between his reelection campaign and Russia. The Russian government and oligarchy reportedly helped Trump and his campaign in exchange for preferential treatment as well as respect for the sanctions from issues related to the two countries.
Although Trump is planning to sue and has already issued a statement that they are suing, on the other end of the spectrum, this will allow the New York Times to actually conduct an investigation to see if the content in the op-ed piece were actually true or false. The Times will now be able to ask whoever they want, and that will also include deposing Trump’s own family, his three eldest children in particular, who are also his political advisors. The Times will also be able to demand records of phone conversations, travel records, in order to ensure that the truth comes out.
As well, the New York Times will also get a chance to file a countersuit for the times that Trump has attacked them on social media as well. Should the New York Times file a countersuit, it will prevent the Trump campaign from dismissing the case in its entirety, something they, Trump and company, seem to think they can do because they somehow are above the law.
In response to the lawsuit, the New York Times spokesperson said, “The Trump campaign has turned to the courts to punish an opinion writer for having an opinion they find unacceptable. Fortunately, the law protects the rights of Americans to express their judgments and conclusions, especially about events of public importance. We look forward to vindicating that right in this case.”
The piece in question was written back in March of 2019, by former executive editor Max Frankel. The piece argued that Trump’s campaign and Russian President Vladimir Putin had an “overarching deal” and that meant that the Russians would help in the campaign against Trump’s then-presidential rival Hillary Clinton, a new foreign policy that is pro-Russia, and removal of the sanctions placed on Russia.
