Uber has agreed to pay A$271.8 million ($178 million) to settle a lawsuit brought by Australian taxi operators and drivers. They claimed to have lost income due to the ride-hailing company's entry into the country.
Reuters noted that the settlement, announced by Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, marks Australia's fifth-largest legal agreement.
Class Action Suit Filed
The class action suit, initiated in the Supreme Court of Victoria State in 2019, represents over 8,000 taxi and hire car owners and drivers. The lawsuit accuses Uber of violating laws that mandate taxis and hire cars to be licensed. Uber's arrival in 2012 disrupted the revenue streams of licensed taxi drivers and devalued the licenses they had invested in.
Uber's Response and Settlement
According to Yahoo, Uber has consistently denied any deliberate breaches of the law. Maurice Blackburn Principal Michael Donelly highlighted the company's strenuous defense throughout the legal process.
However, after years of contention, Uber has opted to settle the matter, according to Donelly. Uber mentioned its contributions to state-level taxi compensation schemes since 2018 and stated that the proposed settlement closes this chapter.
Former Lawmaker's Perspective
Former lawmaker and taxi driver Rod Barton, part of the class action, believes the settlement validates Uber's disregard for the country's taxi licensing regulations. Barton emphasized Uber's conscious avoidance of the licensing rules to gain a competitive edge over the taxi industry. He underscored the significance of the lawsuit in holding Uber accountable for its actions.
Impact of Legislative Changes
In 2015, legislative amendments allowed Uber to operate without taxi licenses, prompting state governments to establish compensation schemes for taxi drivers and license owners. This shift in regulations played a pivotal role in shaping the competitive landscape between traditional taxi services and app-based ride-hailing companies.
The settlement has elicited mixed reactions from various stakeholders. Members of the public and users of ride-sharing services have expressed concerns about potential increases in fares as a result of the settlement. On the other hand, taxi and rental car owners see the settlement as a bittersweet victory. It provides some level of compensation for their losses but does not fully address the long-term impact on their livelihoods.
Industry analysts believe this case sets a significant precedent for how disruptive technologies are integrated into traditional industries, highlighting the need for regulations that protect existing businesses while encouraging innovation.
Photo: Uber Newsroom


YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban
OpenAI Moves to Acquire Neptune as It Expands AI Training Capabilities
Tesla Faces 19% Drop in UK Registrations as Competition Intensifies
Momenta Quietly Moves Toward Hong Kong IPO Amid Rising China-U.S. Tensions
Magnum Audit Flags Governance Issues at Ben & Jerry’s Foundation Ahead of Spin-Off
IKEA Expands U.S. Manufacturing Amid Rising Tariffs and Supply Chain Strategy Shift
Bristol Myers Faces $6.7 Billion Lawsuit After Judge Allows Key Shareholder Claims to Proceed
Singapore Court Allows $2.7 Billion 1MDB Lawsuit Against Standard Chartered to Proceed
Amazon Italy Pays €180M in Compensation as Delivery Staff Probe Ends
Sam Altman Reportedly Explored Funding for Rocket Venture in Potential Challenge to SpaceX
Bolsonaro Blames Medication Mix-Up for Ankle Monitor Tampering as Detention Continues
Northwestern University to Restore Research Funding Under $75 Million Agreement with U.S. Government
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment
U.S. Backs Bayer in Supreme Court Battle Over Roundup Cancer Lawsuits
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup
Microchip Technology Boosts Q3 Outlook on Strong Bookings Momentum 



