The U.S. Supreme Court declined to temporarily block a $655.5 million judgment against the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), allowing the damages award to remain in effect while the organizations pursue an appeal.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor rejected the emergency request on Monday without providing an explanation and did not refer the matter to the full Supreme Court. The ruling stems from a civil lawsuit filed on behalf of Americans who were killed or injured in a series of shootings and bombings in the Jerusalem area between 2002 and 2004.
The case was originally decided in favor of the plaintiffs in 2015, when a New York federal court awarded more than $655 million in damages. However, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the verdict in 2016, ruling that the federal court lacked jurisdiction. The Supreme Court declined to review that decision in 2018.
Congress later enacted the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019, expanding the ability of American victims to pursue claims against Palestinian authorities. The law treats the PA and PLO as consenting to U.S. jurisdiction if they engage in certain activities in the United States or make payments linked to attacks on Americans.
In June 2025, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the law, leading the 2nd Circuit to reinstate the original judgment in March. The Palestinian organizations are now appealing that decision while seeking to delay enforcement.
The PA and PLO argued that collecting the judgment would inflict severe financial damage, threaten essential public services in the West Bank, and undermine regional stability. They said the plaintiffs intend to seek payment from Palestinian tax revenues collected by Israel, a major source of government funding for security, education, and sanitation services.
The organizations also contended that the judgment had effectively become void after earlier appeals concluded in 2018. Despite those arguments, Sotomayor declined to pause enforcement, allowing the legal battle over the multimillion-dollar terrorism-related damages award to continue.


Domino’s Weighs Appeal After Australian Court Rules Workers Were Misled on Pay
xAI Sues Man for Allegedly Using Grok to Generate AI Child Abuse Deepfakes
US State Department Plans to Close Five Foreign Missions in Global Diplomatic Restructuring
AI Avatar of Jair Bolsonaro Sparks Legal Battle Ahead of Brazil’s 2026 Presidential Election
Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Delayed Until 2027 Amid Antitrust Lawsuit
White House: No Weaponized Drones Seized at FIFA World Cup Venues Despite 700 Recoveries
Spain Installs Floating Barrier as Ceuta Migrant Crossings Halt After Deadly Surge
25 Democratic-Led States Sue Trump Administration Over New Global Tariffs
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Rise as Newsom Pushes Settlement in $110 Billion Merger Fight
Former House Appropriations Chair Kay Granger Dies at 83
Israel Strikes Gaza as Trump Ceasefire Push Faces Fresh Challenges
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts
Lebanon Lawyers Seek Probe Into Banker Over Alleged Netanyahu Dinner in Washington
Juan Orlando Hernandez Seeks Dismissal of Honduras Charges After Trump Pardon
Russia Charges Telegram Founder Pavel Durov With Facilitating Terrorism, Seeks International Arrest
DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Freelancer Over North Korea Military Report
EEOC Drops Penn Subpoena in Antisemitism Probe, Investigation Continues 



