Twitch announced upcoming changes to its policy on revenue share from subscriptions. The update, which will be implemented next year, will primarily affect streamers who are under a “premium” agreement with the platform.
The Amazon-owned live streaming service released a lengthy blog post earlier this week. The company tackled existing policies on its revenue share from subscriptions, including its rarely discussed “premium deals” with select Twitch streamers. These creators will be the ones mainly affected by the policy changes taking effect next year.
Once the new policy is implemented, Twitch president Dan Clancy said the first $100,000 earnings from subscriptions will still be split 70/30, with 70% still going to the creator. But subscription revenue exceeding $100,000 will be split in the standard 50/50 share. These changes will take effect after June 1, 2023.
Twitch said this update would not affect what 90% of the streamers with premium revenue share agreements are currently earning from subscriptions. But to those that will be affected, Clancy said the recent increase in the platforms ad revenue split to 55% for the streamers should make up for it.
This is quite an interesting approach, considering that more than 22,000 users previously signed a petition to increase Twitch’s subscription revenue split to 70/30 for all streamers. The company rejected the proposal on Wednesday, the same day the subscription share changes were announced.
In the same blog post, Twitch admitted that it had not been completely transparent about offering “premium” revenue split agreements. The company also acknowledged that these deals tend to benefit streamers with a larger following.
Clancy, meanwhile, cited some reasons for rejecting calls to standardize a 70/30 subscription revenue split like other platforms. One of the reasons Twitch mentioned this was the cost of its service.
“Using the published rates from Amazon Web Services’ Interactive Video Service (IVS) — which is essentially Twitch video — live video costs for a 100 CCU streamer who streams 200 hours a month are more than $1000 per month,” Clancy said. “To fully answer the question of ‘why not 70/30,’ ignoring the high cost of delivering the Twitch service would have meant giving you an incomplete answer.”
Photo by Gage Skidmore from Flickr under Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)


JD.com Pledges 22 Billion Yuan Housing Support for Couriers as China’s Instant Retail Competition Heats Up
U.S. Greenlights Nvidia H200 Chip Exports to China With 25% Fee
Adobe Strengthens AI Strategy Ahead of Q4 Earnings, Says Stifel
Air Transat Reaches Tentative Agreement With Pilots, Avoids Strike and Restores Normal Operations
China Adds Domestic AI Chips to Government Procurement List as U.S. Considers Easing Nvidia Export Curbs
Westpac Director Peter Nash Avoids Major Investor Backlash Amid ASX Scrutiny
Nvidia Develops New Location-Verification Technology for AI Chips
SK Hynix Considers U.S. ADR Listing to Boost Shareholder Value Amid Rising AI Chip Demand
Azul Airlines Wins Court Approval for $2 Billion Debt Restructuring and New Capital Raise
SpaceX Reportedly Preparing Record-Breaking IPO Targeting $1.5 Trillion Valuation
Trump Criticizes EU’s €120 Million Fine on Elon Musk’s X Platform
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand
ADB Approves $400 Million Loan to Boost Ease of Doing Business in the Philippines
Samsung SDI Secures Major LFP Battery Supply Deal in the U.S.
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute
Gulf Sovereign Funds Unite in Paramount–Skydance Bid for Warner Bros Discovery 



