On 12 March, the Bureau of Economic Security (abbreviated - BES) announced that it was requesting a special investigation into the case of the owner of IBOX Bank. On 13 March, Judge Volodymyr Marmash will consider this motion in the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv, kp.ua reports.
The defence believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash violate Ukrainian law.
The BES detectives are seeking to reopen the case against the owner of IBOX BANK, even though on 5 December 2024, the Supreme Court settled the issue once and for all in the criminal case against her and cancelled the illegal decisions made by the detective of the BES Territorial Office in the Lviv Region, thereby confirming the illegality of the prosecution’s actions in the said proceedings.
The defence of the accused believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash, by accepting such a motion for consideration, grossly violate Ukrainian law. After all, the deadline for pretrial investigation in the criminal proceedings against the owner of IBOX BANK has been exceeded by 3 months, which is unacceptable in cases of this category.
Thus, the defence emphasises that the BES’s attempts to reopen the case against the Bank’s management are accompanied by numerous violations of the criminal procedure. 'The prosecution is pursuing its selfish interests, which are not related to a legitimate investigation aimed at identifying the real criminals,' the defence comments.
Earlier, it was reported that it was the Lychakivskyi District Court that considers many cases initiated by the BES and the State Bureau of Investigation (abbreviated – SBI). It was suspected that such cases may be ordered, and their consideration may be managed in a ‘manual mode’ in order to blackmail the accused. It is noted that if such offences are found by the investigator and judge, the penalty may be up to 10 years in prison. If future investigations reveal signs of corruption offences in the actions of these individuals, the penalty may be significantly increased with the mandatory confiscation of property acquired due to such ‘legal’ activities.
As a reminder, it is the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv that has been considering the criminal case against the traitor Viktor Medvedchuk for more than two years. And the Presiding Judge of this Court, Mr Hryhorii Zhovnir, ensured that the case was heard in camera, thus listening to Medvedchuk's lawyers.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes.


Samsung Electronics Shares Jump on HBM4 Mass Production Report
SpaceX Pivots Toward Moon City as Musk Reframes Long-Term Space Vision
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning
Innovent Biologics Shares Rally on New Eli Lilly Oncology and Immunology Deal
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
Anta Sports Expands Global Footprint With Strategic Puma Stake
Kroger Set to Name Former Walmart Executive Greg Foran as Next CEO
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 



