On 12 March, the Bureau of Economic Security (abbreviated - BES) announced that it was requesting a special investigation into the case of the owner of IBOX Bank. On 13 March, Judge Volodymyr Marmash will consider this motion in the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv, kp.ua reports.
The defence believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash violate Ukrainian law.
The BES detectives are seeking to reopen the case against the owner of IBOX BANK, even though on 5 December 2024, the Supreme Court settled the issue once and for all in the criminal case against her and cancelled the illegal decisions made by the detective of the BES Territorial Office in the Lviv Region, thereby confirming the illegality of the prosecution’s actions in the said proceedings.
The defence of the accused believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash, by accepting such a motion for consideration, grossly violate Ukrainian law. After all, the deadline for pretrial investigation in the criminal proceedings against the owner of IBOX BANK has been exceeded by 3 months, which is unacceptable in cases of this category.
Thus, the defence emphasises that the BES’s attempts to reopen the case against the Bank’s management are accompanied by numerous violations of the criminal procedure. 'The prosecution is pursuing its selfish interests, which are not related to a legitimate investigation aimed at identifying the real criminals,' the defence comments.
Earlier, it was reported that it was the Lychakivskyi District Court that considers many cases initiated by the BES and the State Bureau of Investigation (abbreviated – SBI). It was suspected that such cases may be ordered, and their consideration may be managed in a ‘manual mode’ in order to blackmail the accused. It is noted that if such offences are found by the investigator and judge, the penalty may be up to 10 years in prison. If future investigations reveal signs of corruption offences in the actions of these individuals, the penalty may be significantly increased with the mandatory confiscation of property acquired due to such ‘legal’ activities.
As a reminder, it is the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv that has been considering the criminal case against the traitor Viktor Medvedchuk for more than two years. And the Presiding Judge of this Court, Mr Hryhorii Zhovnir, ensured that the case was heard in camera, thus listening to Medvedchuk's lawyers.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes.


Disney Plans to Cut 1,000 Jobs Amid Ongoing Restructuring Efforts
Abbott Laboratories Ordered to Pay $53 Million in Premature Infant Formula Lawsuit
Britain Courts Anthropic Amid US Defense Department Dispute
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy
U.S. Automakers Push Back Against EU Rules Blocking American Trucks from European Market
BHP's Incoming CEO Visits China Amid Pricing Dispute with CMRG
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis
Deere & Company Agrees to $99 Million Settlement Over Right-to-Repair Dispute
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict
Pershing Square Bids €30.40 Per Share to Acquire Universal Music Group in $9.4B Deal
SpaceX IPO: Retail Investors to Play Historic Role in Record-Breaking Public Offering
Bank of America Identifies Top Asia-Pacific Semiconductor Stocks Poised for AI-Driven Growth
China's AI Stocks Surge as Zhipu and MiniMax Hit Record Highs
FedEx Pilots and Union Reach Tentative Agreement on 40% Pay Increase
Goldman Sachs, ANZ Cut Oil Forecasts Amid U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Hopes 



