AI can be a personal trainer in your pocket – but is it safe? 
SK Holdings, KKR Launch $1.3B Renewable Energy Venture in South Korea 
Nvidia Stock Rises as SemiAnalysis Sees AI Data Center Revenue Beating Wall Street Forecasts 
US Egg Producers Settle Price Manipulation Probe, Agree to Pay $3.3 Million and Donate 53 Million Eggs 
Samsung, SK Hynix to Unveil $1.3 Trillion AI and Semiconductor Investment Plan 
Apple Eyes Chinese Memory Chips as AI Shortage Pressures iPhone Supply Chain 
US Judge Seeks Explanation for DOJ’s Decision to Drop Gautam Adani Bribery Case 
EU Chip Industry Faces Growing Risks From China Export Controls and U.S. Technology Dependence: Report 
Australia Sues Amazon Over Prime Video Ads and Subscription Terms 
TSMC CoWoS Capacity Forecast Raised as Mizuho Sees AI Server CPU Demand Surging Through 2027 
Trump Administration Defends Anthropic AI Restrictions in Ongoing Federal Lawsuit 
Nike Q4 Earnings Beat Estimates as Wholesale Growth Offsets Direct Sales Weakness 
ShareChat Eyes 2027 IPO After Reaching Operational Profitability, Report Says 
Chip Stocks Rally as Samsung and SK Hynix’s $1.3 Trillion Investment Plan Boosts AI Optimism 
U.S. Supreme Court to Review Trump Administration Appeal on Immigrant Detention Without Bond Hearings 
Meta Stock Jumps as AI Cloud Expansion Challenges AWS, Microsoft, and Google 
Voting technology firm Smartmatic has been charged in U.S. federal court in Florida with money laundering and foreign bribery, marking a major development in an ongoing investigation into alleged corruption tied to elections in the Philippines. Federal prosecutors named Smartmatic’s parent company, SGO Corp, as a defendant in the case, which also includes three former executives accused of paying bribes between 2015 and 2018 to secure government contracts.
According to prosecutors, the executives allegedly funneled $1 million in bribes to a former Philippine election official using a slush fund created through inflated invoices for voting machines used in the 2016 Philippine elections. These payments were reportedly disguised in financial documents through coded language.
Smartmatic, however, denied all allegations, describing the charges as “wrong on the facts and wrong on the law.” The company stated that it has cooperated extensively with investigators and accused prosecutors of being “politically influenced by powerful interests.” Smartmatic vowed to contest the charges and expressed confidence that it would be cleared.
Among those charged is Smartmatic president and co-founder Roger Alejandro Pinate Martinez, who, along with other defendants, has pleaded not guilty. Pinate called the indictment legally deficient and asked the court to dismiss it. Federal prosecutors in Miami have not commented on the case.
The indictment comes as Smartmatic is also pursuing a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox Corporation and several commentators, alleging that Fox falsely claimed Smartmatic’s machines rigged the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox has denied wrongdoing, asserting that its coverage was protected by the First Amendment and constituted fair reporting on a matter of public concern.
This case intensifies scrutiny on election technology companies and raises broader questions about transparency, governance, and political influence in global election systems.
