Anthropic Revenue Run Rate Hits $65 Billion as IPO Plans Accelerate 
Barclays Downgrades Renault as Cost Savings Challenges Grow 
Peru Court Frees Former President Ollanta Humala After Conviction Overturned 
Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Delayed Until 2027 Amid Antitrust Lawsuit 
Toyota, Honda Shares Rise on Possible U.S.-Canada Auto Tariff Cut 
Johnson & Johnson Proposes $5.5 Billion Talc Settlement to Resolve U.S. Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits 
Goldman Sachs Names 9 Top Japanese Semiconductor and Electronics Stocks 
Unitree Robotics Shares Soar Over 600% in Shanghai Market Debut 
Samsung Eyes $72 Billion Shareholder Return Plan as AI Chip Boom Fuels Profits 
Moody’s Upgrades Vodafone Hybrid Debt Ratings to Baa3 
Micron Stock Upgraded to Buy as New Street Sees $2 Trillion Valuation Potential 
Australia’s Corporate Leaders Face Parliament Over KPMG Client Data Scandal 
J.P. Morgan Upgrades SanDisk, Sets $2,250 Price Target on AI NAND Growth 
SK Hynix Shares Surge on Record $28.6 Billion Buyback 
Alphabet Eyes First Australian Dollar Bond as AI Spending Drives Funding Push 
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Voting technology firm Smartmatic has been charged in U.S. federal court in Florida with money laundering and foreign bribery, marking a major development in an ongoing investigation into alleged corruption tied to elections in the Philippines. Federal prosecutors named Smartmatic’s parent company, SGO Corp, as a defendant in the case, which also includes three former executives accused of paying bribes between 2015 and 2018 to secure government contracts.
According to prosecutors, the executives allegedly funneled $1 million in bribes to a former Philippine election official using a slush fund created through inflated invoices for voting machines used in the 2016 Philippine elections. These payments were reportedly disguised in financial documents through coded language.
Smartmatic, however, denied all allegations, describing the charges as “wrong on the facts and wrong on the law.” The company stated that it has cooperated extensively with investigators and accused prosecutors of being “politically influenced by powerful interests.” Smartmatic vowed to contest the charges and expressed confidence that it would be cleared.
Among those charged is Smartmatic president and co-founder Roger Alejandro Pinate Martinez, who, along with other defendants, has pleaded not guilty. Pinate called the indictment legally deficient and asked the court to dismiss it. Federal prosecutors in Miami have not commented on the case.
The indictment comes as Smartmatic is also pursuing a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox Corporation and several commentators, alleging that Fox falsely claimed Smartmatic’s machines rigged the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox has denied wrongdoing, asserting that its coverage was protected by the First Amendment and constituted fair reporting on a matter of public concern.
This case intensifies scrutiny on election technology companies and raises broader questions about transparency, governance, and political influence in global election systems.
