Nike announced it would stop using kangaroo leather for its Tiempo soccer boot line two weeks after PUMA said it would stop producing football boots with such material this year.
According to Nike, it will replace the kangaroo leathers with a proprietary synthetic upper beginning this year.
A bill passed in Oregon earlier this year will soon prohibit the sale of any kangaroo parts or kangaroo-based products.
With Nike’s Beaverton headquarters based in the state, the new mandate may have played a significant role in the decision.
Kangaroo leather, which is lighter, stronger, and more flexible than cow and goat hide, is commonly used in top soccer cheat models, such as the Nike Tiempo 9 Elite, Puma KING, and Adidas Predator Pulse lines.
Earlier this month, PUMA revealed that its flagship KING soccer boot will feature non-animal-based upper materials with at least 20 percent recycled fabrics, dubbed “K-BETTER.”


Trump's Transgender Sports Ban Faces Enforcement Challenges
Locked up then locked out: how NZ’s bank rules make life for ex-prisoners even harder
Taiwan Urges Stronger Trade Ties With Fellow Democracies, Rejects Economic Dependence on China
How did sport become so popular? The ancient history of a modern obsession
Why Manchester City offered Erling Haaland the longest contract in Premier League history
Extreme heat, flooding, wildfires – Colorado’s formerly incarcerated people on the hazards they faced behind bars
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Elon Musk’s Empire: SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI Merger Talks Spark Investor Debate
Trump Booed at Club World Cup Final, Praises Pele as Soccer’s GOAT
CSPC Pharma and AstraZeneca Forge Multibillion-Dollar Partnership to Develop Long-Acting Peptide Drugs
China and Uruguay Strengthen Strategic Partnership Amid Shifting Global Order
Trump Draws Cheers at Ryder Cup as U.S. Trails Europe After Opening Day
AI is driving down the price of knowledge – universities have to rethink what they offer
Australia’s major sports codes are considered not-for-profits – is it time for them to pay up? 



