Stock Futures Dip as Investors Await Key Payrolls Data 
Trump’s "Shock and Awe" Agenda: Executive Orders from Day One 
China’s Growth Faces Structural Challenges Amid Doubts Over Data 
Goldman Predicts 50% Odds of 10% U.S. Tariff on Copper by Q1 Close 
S&P 500 Relies on Tech for Growth in Q4 2024, Says Barclays 
Moldova Criticizes Russia Amid Transdniestria Energy Crisis 
US Futures Rise as Investors Eye Earnings, Inflation Data, and Wildfire Impacts 
European Stocks Rally on Chinese Growth and Mining Merger Speculation 
UBS Projects Mixed Market Outlook for 2025 Amid Trump Policy Uncertainty 
Indonesia Surprises Markets with Interest Rate Cut Amid Currency Pressure 
U.S. Stocks vs. Bonds: Are Diverging Valuations Signaling a Shift? 
Fed May Resume Rate Hikes: BofA Analysts Outline Key Scenarios 
Urban studies: Doing research when every city is different 
Energy Sector Outlook 2025: AI's Role and Market Dynamics 
U.S. Treasury Yields Expected to Decline Amid Cooling Economic Pressures 
UBS Predicts Potential Fed Rate Cut Amid Strong US Economic Data 
Mexico's Undervalued Equity Market Offers Long-Term Investment Potential 
Cash at US non-financial investment-grade firms continued to climb in 2014, while at US non-financial speculative-grade companies it fell, Moody's Investors Service says in a new report. For the fifth consecutive year revenue grew faster at speculative-grade companies, while these firms also directed a far higher percentage of cash flow to shareholders.
"At the end of 2014, investment-grade companies' aggregate cash was up 9% on the prior year, to $1.4 trillion, while at speculative-grade companies it was down 9%, to $281 billion," says Senior Vice President, Richard Lane. "Steeper increases in capital spending at speculative-grade companies, as well as their heavier allocation of discretionary cash flow to acquisitions and shareholder returns, contributed to the divergence."
Speculative-grade companies spent 397% of their discretionary cash flow on dividends and buybacks last year, against investment-grade companies' 97%.
Capital spending at speculative-grade firms rose 7.2%, to $223 billion, in 2014, while at investment-grade companies it increased 6%, to $714 billion, Lane says in "M&A, Shareholder Returns Drive Lower Cash Balances At Spec-Grade Firms." Spending on plant and equipment by all Moody's-rated US non-financial companies has gone up every year since the 2008-09 recession, accounting for 7.9% of revenue last year, against an average of 7.3% since 2007.
Acquisition spending rose more among investment-grade companies in the past 12 months in absolute dollars, but accounted for a larger portion of speculative-grade firms' discretionary cash flow. While investment-grade companies spent 30% of discretionary cash flow, or $194 billion, on acquisitions, speculative-grade companies spent 950% of discretionary cash flow, or $128 billion.
Revenue, cash flow from operations and EBITDA all grew faster at speculative-grade firms than at investment-grade companies in 2014, although investment grade is much larger, representing 77%, 84%, and 85% of each category's total.
"Based on our outlook for low-single-digit global economic growth in 2015-16, and weakness in the energy sector, we expect slower revenue growth and a decline in cash flows this year at both investment-grade and speculative-grade firms," Lane says. "In terms of margins, the investment-grade sector remains stronger and more stable, with an average EBITDA margin of 17.5% since 2007, while in the high-yield sector it has averaged 10.2% over the same period."
