Instagram announced on Monday that it is pressing pause on its project, widely referred to as Instagram Kids. The Facebook-owned company, however, clarified it is not completely scrapping its plans for a photo-sharing app designed for users under the age of 13.
Adam Mosseri, head of Instagram, said in a statement on Monday that they will continue consulting with parents, experts, and policymakers to gather feedback and “demonstrate the value and importance” of Instagram Kids. The entire post suggests that the negative feedback the company has received is one of the main reasons the project is temporarily halted.
However, Instagram noted that they still believe having an app designed for users under 13 would be a better scenario for kids and parents. “The reality is that kids are already online, and we believe that developing age-appropriate experiences designed specifically for them is far better for parents than where we are today,” the company said.
The social network company further clarified that Instagram Kids is not designed to function the same way as the current version of the photo-sharing app, which requires users to be at least 13 years old. Instagram said the app is aimed to be used by kids aged 10-12, it will require parental permission, will not display ads, and will offer age-appropriate content and features.
While the Instagram Kids development is on hold, the company said it is working on parental supervision tools. These features are going to be added to the currently available photo-sharing app. The company did not provide specific details yet but said they have more to reveal in the coming months.
The Instagram Kids project was confirmed last March, but it was still in early development. In an interview with BuzzFeed News, Mosseri said a “detailed plan” was not yet available at the time.
The project has since faced criticisms and an official inquiry from a group of U.S. lawmakers in April. Earlier this month, the Wall Street Journal released an in-depth report as part of its “Facebook Files” series revealing excerpts of internal research documents.
One slide presentation cited in the article was from 2020 and reportedly stated, “Thirty-two percent of teen girls said that when they felt bad about their bodies, Instagram made them feel worse.” Facebook has responded to WSJ’s report on Sunday, arguing that many of the teenagers they talked to said Instagram helped them get through difficult times.
Photo by Luke van Zyl on Unsplash


Super Micro Computer Shares Plunge After Co-Founder Charged in AI Chip Smuggling Case
Golden Dome Missile Defense: Anduril and Palantir Join Forces on Trump's $185B Space Shield
Judge Dismisses Sam Altman Sexual Abuse Lawsuit, But Sister Can Refile
Amazon's "Transformer" Phone: Can It Succeed Where Fire Phone Failed?
OpenAI's Desktop Superapp: Unifying ChatGPT, Codex, and Browser Tools for Enterprise AI
SpaceX IPO Filing Expected This Week as Valuation Could Surpass $75 Billion
NVIDIA's Feynman AI Chip May Face Redesign Amid TSMC Capacity Crunch
Nanya Technology Shares Surge 10% After $2.5 Billion Private Placement from Sandisk and Cisco
Elon Musk Confirms SpaceX, xAI, and Tesla Will Continue Large-Scale Nvidia Chip Orders
Google's TurboQuant Algorithm Sends Memory Chip Stocks Tumbling
Reflection AI Eyes $25 Billion Valuation in Massive $2.5 Billion Funding Round
Apple Defies China's Smartphone Slump with Strong Early 2026 Sales
Xiaomi's AI Model "Hunter Alpha" Mistaken for DeepSeek's Next Release
Trump White House Unveils National AI Policy Framework for Congress
Alibaba Bets on AI Agents to Unify Its Vast Digital Ecosystem
Meta Ties Executive Pay to Aggressive Stock Price Targets in Major Retention Push 



