California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit 
United Airlines Tokyo-Bound Flight Returns to Dulles After Engine Failure 
SpaceX Begins IPO Preparations as Wall Street Banks Line Up for Advisory Roles 
Shell M&A Chief Exits After BP Takeover Proposal Rejected 
SUPERFORTUNE Launches AI-Powered Mobile App, Expanding Beyond Web3 Into $392 Billion Metaphysics Market 
Robinhood Expands Sports Event Contracts With Player Performance Wagers 
Amazon in Talks to Invest $10 Billion in OpenAI as AI Firm Eyes $1 Trillion IPO Valuation 
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Plunge on Earnings Warning Amid U.S. and China Weakness 
Strategy Retains Nasdaq 100 Spot Amid Growing Scrutiny of Bitcoin Treasury Model 
Nvidia Weighs Expanding H200 AI Chip Production as China Demand Surges 
CMOC to Acquire Equinox Gold’s Brazilian Mines in $1 Billion Deal to Expand Precious Metals Portfolio 
Nomura Expands Alternative Assets Strategy With Focus on Private Debt Acquisitions 
Coca-Cola’s Proposed Sale of Costa Coffee Faces Uncertainty Amid Price Dispute 
iRobot Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Rising Competition and Tariff Pressures 
HSBC’s $13.6 Billion Take-Private Offer for Hang Seng Bank Gains Board Backing 
Apple Explores India for iPhone Chip Assembly as Manufacturing Push Accelerates 
FDA Says No Black Box Warning Planned for COVID-19 Vaccines Despite Safety Debate 
 - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Jan. 15, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:GPRO) in the United District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased GoPro securities between July 21, 2015 through January 13, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
The Complaint alleges that Defendants issued materially false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (1) GoPro was experiencing weak sales of its HERO line of cameras; (2) GoPro was experiencing weak HERO4 Session sales at the time the third Quarter guidance was announced; (3) GoPro’s third quarter 2015 guidance was based on the assumption that GoPro would be able to sell a significant additional amount of HERO4 Session cameras; (4) GoPro’s third and fourth quarter 2015 guidance was inflated and unrealistic; and (5) as a result, Defendants’ statements about GoPro’s business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 14, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
