Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026 
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
 - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Jan. 15, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:GPRO) in the United District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased GoPro securities between July 21, 2015 through January 13, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
The Complaint alleges that Defendants issued materially false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (1) GoPro was experiencing weak sales of its HERO line of cameras; (2) GoPro was experiencing weak HERO4 Session sales at the time the third Quarter guidance was announced; (3) GoPro’s third quarter 2015 guidance was based on the assumption that GoPro would be able to sell a significant additional amount of HERO4 Session cameras; (4) GoPro’s third and fourth quarter 2015 guidance was inflated and unrealistic; and (5) as a result, Defendants’ statements about GoPro’s business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 14, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
