A federal appeals court has blocked a Trump administration initiative that would have required hospitals serving low-income Americans to pay full prices upfront for certain high-cost prescription drugs before receiving rebates later, marking a significant development in U.S. healthcare and drug pricing policy.
On Wednesday, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request from President Donald Trump’s administration to pause an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maine. That injunction halted a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) program that would have fundamentally changed how safety-net hospitals purchase some of the most expensive medications covered under Medicare drug price negotiations.
The lawsuit was brought by the American Hospital Association (AHA) along with several healthcare providers, who argued that the new drug pricing model represented a sudden and harmful departure from decades of established policy. Under the long-standing 340B Drug Pricing Program, drugmakers have been required to offer upfront discounts to hospitals that serve vulnerable and low-income populations. The hospitals warned that replacing upfront discounts with a rebate-based system would impose hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs and strain already limited resources.
The blocked policy would have applied to the first 10 medications selected for Medicare price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, passed during President Joe Biden’s administration. These drugs include widely used treatments such as Eliquis, a blood thinner sold by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb; Xarelto, produced by Johnson & Johnson; and Merck & Co.’s diabetes drug Januvia.
HRSA argued that its 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, announced in July, was designed to prevent drug manufacturers from providing duplicate discounts, which they are permitted to avoid under the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the pilot, manufacturers could charge hospitals wholesale prices and issue rebates afterward to align with negotiated Medicare prices.
However, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker ruled that HRSA failed to properly assess the impact of the rebate model on rural and safety-net hospitals, violating the Administrative Procedure Act. His December 29 injunction stopped the program from taking effect on January 1, a decision now upheld by the appeals court.


Mercedes-Benz Stock Offers Deep-Value Potential as Citi Sees Recovery Catalysts
Takeda Hit With $885M Verdict Over Amitiza Generic Drug Delay Scheme
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Jump as U.S. Overhaul Lifts FY2026 Outlook
Taiwan Tests Penghu Defense, Mobile Internet Limits in War Drills
RFK Jr. Orders Extended Hantavirus Quarantine for Cruise Passenger
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Rise as Newsom Pushes Settlement in $110 Billion Merger Fight
DOJ Rescinds Anti-Weaponization Fund Ahead of Todd Blanche Senate Confirmation Vote
25 Democratic-Led States Sue Trump Administration Over New Global Tariffs
Maduro, U.S. Prosecutors Propose June 2027 Trial Date in Drug Trafficking Case
AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb Explore Mega Merger Worth Nearly $400 Billion
Ukraine Accuses Russia of Systematic Torture of POWs and Civilian Detainees
Senate Majority Leader John Thune Moves to Advance Crypto Clarity Act
FDA Investigates New Cyclospora Outbreak as U.S. Cases Continue to Rise
Nvidia Secures $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Push With Wall Street Giants
Peru Court Frees Former President Ollanta Humala After Conviction Overturned
Johnson & Johnson Proposes $5.5 Billion Talc Settlement to Resolve U.S. Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits
Sony, TSMC Eye $6.3 Billion Japan Chip Venture for Next-Gen Image Sensors 



