A federal appeals court has blocked a Trump administration initiative that would have required hospitals serving low-income Americans to pay full prices upfront for certain high-cost prescription drugs before receiving rebates later, marking a significant development in U.S. healthcare and drug pricing policy.
On Wednesday, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request from President Donald Trump’s administration to pause an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maine. That injunction halted a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) program that would have fundamentally changed how safety-net hospitals purchase some of the most expensive medications covered under Medicare drug price negotiations.
The lawsuit was brought by the American Hospital Association (AHA) along with several healthcare providers, who argued that the new drug pricing model represented a sudden and harmful departure from decades of established policy. Under the long-standing 340B Drug Pricing Program, drugmakers have been required to offer upfront discounts to hospitals that serve vulnerable and low-income populations. The hospitals warned that replacing upfront discounts with a rebate-based system would impose hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs and strain already limited resources.
The blocked policy would have applied to the first 10 medications selected for Medicare price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, passed during President Joe Biden’s administration. These drugs include widely used treatments such as Eliquis, a blood thinner sold by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb; Xarelto, produced by Johnson & Johnson; and Merck & Co.’s diabetes drug Januvia.
HRSA argued that its 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, announced in July, was designed to prevent drug manufacturers from providing duplicate discounts, which they are permitted to avoid under the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the pilot, manufacturers could charge hospitals wholesale prices and issue rebates afterward to align with negotiated Medicare prices.
However, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker ruled that HRSA failed to properly assess the impact of the rebate model on rural and safety-net hospitals, violating the Administrative Procedure Act. His December 29 injunction stopped the program from taking effect on January 1, a decision now upheld by the appeals court.


Najib Razak Awaits Court Rulings in 1MDB Case as Malaysia’s Anti-Graft Drive Faces Test
AstraZeneca’s LATIFY Phase III Trial of Ceralasertib Misses Primary Endpoint in Lung Cancer Study
Maduro Set for U.S. Court Appearance After Dramatic Capture as Trump Signals Tougher Venezuela Stance
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Wins FDA Approval for New Motion Sickness Drug After Four Decades
U.S. Seizes Venezuela-Linked Oil Tankers as Trump Escalates Control Over Regional Energy Flows
Embraer Boosts Aircraft Deliveries in Q4 2025, Signaling Strong Growth Into 2026
Intel Unveils Panther Lake AI Laptop Chips at CES 2025, Marking Major 18A Manufacturing Milestone
Disney Agrees to $10 Million Settlement Over Child Privacy Violations on YouTube
Justice Department Restores Trump Photo in Epstein Files After Review Clears Image
Najib Razak Jailed 15 More Years in Landmark 1MDB Verdict With Major Political Impact
Trump Administration Eyes Control of Venezuela’s Oil Industry to Push Prices Toward $50 a Barrel
U.S. DOT Withholds $160 Million From California Over Commercial Driver’s License Dispute
Dell Revives XPS Laptop Lineup With New XPS 14 and XPS 16 to Boost Premium PC Demand
Nvidia Unveils Rubin Platform to Power Next Wave of AI Infrastructure
Tesla UK Sales Slide as Competition Intensifies, While BYD Surges in Electric Vehicle Market 



