A federal appeals court has blocked a Trump administration initiative that would have required hospitals serving low-income Americans to pay full prices upfront for certain high-cost prescription drugs before receiving rebates later, marking a significant development in U.S. healthcare and drug pricing policy.
On Wednesday, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request from President Donald Trump’s administration to pause an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maine. That injunction halted a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) program that would have fundamentally changed how safety-net hospitals purchase some of the most expensive medications covered under Medicare drug price negotiations.
The lawsuit was brought by the American Hospital Association (AHA) along with several healthcare providers, who argued that the new drug pricing model represented a sudden and harmful departure from decades of established policy. Under the long-standing 340B Drug Pricing Program, drugmakers have been required to offer upfront discounts to hospitals that serve vulnerable and low-income populations. The hospitals warned that replacing upfront discounts with a rebate-based system would impose hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs and strain already limited resources.
The blocked policy would have applied to the first 10 medications selected for Medicare price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, passed during President Joe Biden’s administration. These drugs include widely used treatments such as Eliquis, a blood thinner sold by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb; Xarelto, produced by Johnson & Johnson; and Merck & Co.’s diabetes drug Januvia.
HRSA argued that its 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, announced in July, was designed to prevent drug manufacturers from providing duplicate discounts, which they are permitted to avoid under the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the pilot, manufacturers could charge hospitals wholesale prices and issue rebates afterward to align with negotiated Medicare prices.
However, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker ruled that HRSA failed to properly assess the impact of the rebate model on rural and safety-net hospitals, violating the Administrative Procedure Act. His December 29 injunction stopped the program from taking effect on January 1, a decision now upheld by the appeals court.


Qatar Condemns Drone Strike as Iran Conflict Threatens Gulf Shipping and Global Markets
Sam Altman Moves to Dismiss Punitive Damages in Sister's Sexual Abuse Lawsuit
Moderna to Pay Up to $2.25B to Settle LNP Patent Dispute Over COVID-19 Vaccine Technology
Sony Forecasts Lower 2027 Profit Despite Strong Music and Sensor Growth
Iran Military Readiness Intensifies After Meeting With Mojtaba Khamenei
Aung San Suu Kyi Moved to House Arrest Amid Myanmar Political Crisis
Taiwan Confident in Strong U.S. Relations Ahead of Trump-Xi China Summit
Aker BP Q1 Profit Jumps on Higher Oil Prices and Asset Reversal
Daiichi Sankyo Stock Drops After Earnings Delay and Oncology Review
Judge Dismisses Elon Musk’s Fraud Claims Against OpenAI, Trial to Proceed on Remaining Allegations
Netanyahu Signals Plan to End Reliance on U.S. Military Aid Within 10 Years
Trump Rejects Iran Proposal as Strait of Hormuz Crisis Pushes Oil Prices Higher
Trump Administration Seeks Court Pause to Reinstate 10% Global Tariffs
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects
Hantavirus Cruise Ship Outbreak Triggers Global Health Alert
EU Approves New Sanctions on Israeli Settlers and Hamas Leaders
Nintendo Shares Tumble as Weak Forecast and Rising Switch 2 Costs Worry Investors 



