U.S. Backs Bayer in Supreme Court Battle Over Roundup Cancer Lawsuits 
Pfizer Sues Novo Nordisk Over Alleged Tactics to Block Obesity Drug Competition 
UN General Assembly Demands Russia Return Ukrainian Children Amid Ongoing Conflict 
Key Witness Seeks to Block Evidence in Potential Revival of Comey Case 
Cogent Biosciences Soars 120% on Breakthrough Phase 3 Results for Bezuclastinib in GIST Treatment 
Novo Nordisk Appoints Greg Miley as Global Head of Corporate Affairs Amid U.S. Pricing Pressure 
U.S. Experts to Reassess Newborn Hepatitis B Vaccination Guidelines Amid Growing Debate 
Airline Loyalty Programs Face New Uncertainty as Visa–Mastercard Fee Settlement Evolves 
Michael Dell Pledges $6.25 Billion to Boost Children’s Investment Accounts Under Trump Initiative 
Tesla Faces 19% Drop in UK Registrations as Competition Intensifies 
Germany’s Economic Recovery Slows as Trade Tensions and Rising Costs Weigh on Growth 
Trump Hints at Major Autism Announcement, Raises Questions on Tylenol Link 
IKEA Expands U.S. Manufacturing Amid Rising Tariffs and Supply Chain Strategy Shift 
Judge Dismisses Charges Against Comey and Letitia James After Ruling on Prosecutor’s Appointment 
Mexico Probes Miss Universe President Raul Rocha Over Alleged Criminal Links 
Asian Markets Stabilize as Wall Street Rebounds and Rate Concerns Ease 
Japan’s Nikkei Drops as Markets Await Key U.S. Inflation Data 
A Japanese court ruled that an order for restaurant chain operator Global-Dining Inc. to reduce business hours amid the coronavirus pandemic was illegal, as it did not fulfill certain conditions.
Presiding Judge Norihiro Matsuda stated in his decision that it is difficult to acknowledge that Global-Dining enhanced the chance of the virus spreading throughout the community.
He further claimed that because the directive was issued just days before the state of emergency was removed, it had "just a little influence on infection management."
The metropolitan government claims that Global-Dining's commnets on its website caused other eateries to be hesitant to comply with the decree. The court, however, disagreed.
Global-Dining, on the other hand, claims that imposing blanket limits without providing evidence that restaurants are a source of illnesses is a violation of the Constitutional right of corporate freedom.
The firm, which owns and operates dozens of eateries, promptly filed an appeal.
