Menu

Search

  |   Insights & Views

Menu

  |   Insights & Views

Search

Attractive restaurant servers can influence what we think of our meals

0
comments

More than ever, dining out is an activity woven into our daily lives. At their best, restaurants hold the public’s attention because they reflect and radiate taste, culture and a vision of the good life.

Yet despite all this positive attention, the alignment of the overall restaurant experience with the food itself is often overlooked when we dine out. In many cases, guests are set up for high culinary expectations because of the restaurant’s decor and environment, and are sometimes disappointed by less-than-inspired food.

Previous research has shown that environmental cues — including sounds, smells and aesthetics — can have a significant impact on the overall consumer experience in retail settings. As it turns out, these environmental cues can also impact the dining experience, including the taste of the food.

To this end, my recent research, co-authored with JoAndrea Hoegg and Karl Aquino from the University of British Columbia, suggests that the physical attractiveness of servers can help form expectations of a dining experience.

Published in the Journal of Retailing, we examined whether and how the presence of attractive individuals altered consumers’ evaluations of their dining experiences. Furthermore, we hypothesized that such a connection only exists with heterosexual male diners, and only when their servers are female.

Restaurants hire the attractive

The employment of attractive individuals is a sometimes controversial yet surprisingly common strategy in service settings, including food retailers. Our research, based on online surveys and lab experiments, showed the divergent effects that physical attractiveness can have on taste perception.

We found that a mediocre meal is experienced as even worse with the presence of an attractive server. In other words, a lousy meal tasted even more unpleasant when consumers were first exposed to an attractive server.

This can be attributed to what is known as the negative disconfirmation effect, a phenomenon in which negative information is introduced to consumers who had already formed positive expectations. It is a reflection that their expectations, based on the server’s appearance, were not met. That gap between expectations and reality can lead to surprise and disappointment.

On the flip side, the presence of attractive people does not backfire with a relatively good meal. The takeaway is that customer impressions are dependent on a mix of food taste and server appearances.

There are caveats here. At the individual level, some consumers are more likely than others to be influenced by environmental cues. Others are more cognizant of the environment that influences them, and therefore less susceptible to allowing such cues to distort their sensory experience.

Gender differences

We also found gender differences in how men and women can be influenced. For example, women were less susceptible than men to being swayed by server attractiveness.

What does this mean for restaurants? We believe restaurateurs should remain focused on what kind of experience they are actually offering. If the goal is to have diners focus on the food — including quality, sourcing, sustainability and taste — then distracting environmental cues that fail to align with the menu should, at the very least, be reconsidered.

A recent mini-controversy reported in The New York Times about a master musician’s annoyance with a notable restaurant’s lacklustre musical playlist reminds us that environmental cues can resonate with customers as much as culinary ones.

We are not suggesting restaurants should be devoid of environmental cues. But managers should be mindful of when and how they are used. Importantly, they should be aware that any kind of mismatch between expectations and reality is likely to leave customers unhappy.

  • ET PRO
  • Market Data

Market-moving news and views, 24 hours a day >

February 15 21:00 UTC Released

UST Flows,Incl.Swaps

Actual

-66.6 Bln USD

Forecast

Previous

25.3 Bln USD

February 15 21:00 UTC Released

USOverall Net Capital Flows

Actual

-33.1 Bln USD

Forecast

Previous

31 Bln USD

January 31 00:00 UTC 551052551052m

ARAnnual Primary Balance*

Actual

Forecast

2016 bln ARS

Previous

Bln AR bln ARS

January 31 00:00 UTC 551052551052m

ARAnnual Primary Balance*

Actual

Forecast

2016 bln ARS

Previous

Bln AR bln ARS

January 22 19:00 UTC 562872562872m

ARTrade Balance

Actual

Forecast

Previous

-1541 %

January 31 00:00 UTC 551052551052m

ARAnnual Primary Balance*

Actual

Forecast

2016 bln ARS

Previous

Bln AR bln ARS

January 22 19:00 UTC 562872562872m

ARTrade Balance

Actual

Forecast

Previous

-1541 %

January 31 00:00 UTC 551052551052m

ARAnnual Primary Balance*

Actual

Forecast

2016 bln ARS

Previous

Bln AR bln ARS

January 31 00:00 UTC 551052551052m

ARAnnual Primary Balance*

Actual

Forecast

2016 bln ARS

Previous

Bln AR bln ARS

January 31 00:00 UTC 551052551052m

ARAnnual Primary Balance*

Actual

Forecast

2016 bln ARS

Previous

Bln AR bln ARS

Close

Welcome to EconoTimes

Sign up for daily updates for the most important
stories unfolding in the global economy.