The Wall Street Journal recently reported Beijing’s decision to ban the sale of “iPhone 6” units in the city because of design disputes with a local phone manufacturer. This is the latest in a series of harassment practices that China has been directing at “Apple,” which reportedly contributed to the abysmal sales performance of the tech giant.
The issue stemmed from the similarities that two of “Apple’s” “iPhone 6” units shared with that of “100C” smartphone by “Shenzhen Beili” in terms of design. “Shenzhen Beili” is a small smartphone company and has nowhere near the global market share that “Apple” has, but China is known for often favoring local companies whenever a legal dispute arises involving international brands.
However, the Independent reported that the administrative order has been put on hold, which means that “Apple” could still keep selling the “iPhone” units in question. Unfortunately, media coverage of the issue painted the incident with more unsettling implications than what the company thought was warranted, thus leading to consequences pertaining to stock prices and investor confidence.
Chuck Jones over at Forbes covered “Apple’s” investment week and the effects that the issue has had on the company’s performance. As expected, share prices are down by 3.5 percent and performance with both S&P and NASDAQ was poor at 1.2 and 1.9 percent respectively.
The tech giant has been experiencing some difficulty maintaining the level of stability of late that they enjoyed for over a decade thanks to the combination of factors like China’s attitude towards the company, waning user interest, and even intensifying competition. Just last April, billionaire investor Carl Icahn sold his shares in “Apple” because he was afraid of the consequences wrought by China’s aggression.
Even with the staying of the administrative order to halt “iPhone 6” sales after “Apple” filed an appeal, Jones still presses the point that this just another example of how the government agencies in China can toy with the American company whenever they want. The only reason why these agencies are not overtly trying to ban “Apple’s” products altogether is how it will affect Chinese workers as well.


Banks Consider $38 Billion Funding Boost for Oracle, Vantage, and OpenAI Expansion
Norway’s Wealth Fund Backs Shareholder Push for Microsoft Human-Rights Risk Report
Baidu Cuts Jobs as AI Competition and Ad Revenue Slump Intensify
Intel Boosts Malaysia Operations with Additional RM860 Million Investment
AI-Guided Drones Transform Ukraine’s Battlefield Strategy
Microchip Technology Boosts Q3 Outlook on Strong Bookings Momentum
Apple Leads Singles’ Day Smartphone Sales as iPhone 17 Demand Surges
Nexperia Urges China Division to Resume Chip Production as Supply Risks Mount
ByteDance Unveils New AI Voice Assistant for ZTE Smartphones
Samsung Launches Galaxy Z TriFold to Elevate Its Position in the Foldable Smartphone Market
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment
Australia Releases New National AI Plan, Opts for Existing Laws to Manage Risks
Apple Appoints Amar Subramanya as New Vice President of AI Amid Push to Accelerate Innovation
Sam Altman Reportedly Explored Funding for Rocket Venture in Potential Challenge to SpaceX
OpenAI Moves to Acquire Neptune as It Expands AI Training Capabilities
Coupang Apologizes After Massive Data Breach Affecting 33.7 Million Users 



