The Wall Street Journal recently reported Beijing’s decision to ban the sale of “iPhone 6” units in the city because of design disputes with a local phone manufacturer. This is the latest in a series of harassment practices that China has been directing at “Apple,” which reportedly contributed to the abysmal sales performance of the tech giant.
The issue stemmed from the similarities that two of “Apple’s” “iPhone 6” units shared with that of “100C” smartphone by “Shenzhen Beili” in terms of design. “Shenzhen Beili” is a small smartphone company and has nowhere near the global market share that “Apple” has, but China is known for often favoring local companies whenever a legal dispute arises involving international brands.
However, the Independent reported that the administrative order has been put on hold, which means that “Apple” could still keep selling the “iPhone” units in question. Unfortunately, media coverage of the issue painted the incident with more unsettling implications than what the company thought was warranted, thus leading to consequences pertaining to stock prices and investor confidence.
Chuck Jones over at Forbes covered “Apple’s” investment week and the effects that the issue has had on the company’s performance. As expected, share prices are down by 3.5 percent and performance with both S&P and NASDAQ was poor at 1.2 and 1.9 percent respectively.
The tech giant has been experiencing some difficulty maintaining the level of stability of late that they enjoyed for over a decade thanks to the combination of factors like China’s attitude towards the company, waning user interest, and even intensifying competition. Just last April, billionaire investor Carl Icahn sold his shares in “Apple” because he was afraid of the consequences wrought by China’s aggression.
Even with the staying of the administrative order to halt “iPhone 6” sales after “Apple” filed an appeal, Jones still presses the point that this just another example of how the government agencies in China can toy with the American company whenever they want. The only reason why these agencies are not overtly trying to ban “Apple’s” products altogether is how it will affect Chinese workers as well.


Apple Forecasts Strong Revenue Growth as iPhone Demand Surges in China and India
Nintendo Shares Slide After Earnings Miss Raises Switch 2 Margin Concerns
SpaceX Reports $8 Billion Profit as IPO Plans and Starlink Growth Fuel Valuation Buzz
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
Sandisk Stock Soars After Blowout Earnings and AI-Driven Outlook
Anthropic Eyes $350 Billion Valuation as AI Funding and Share Sale Accelerate
Google Cloud and Liberty Global Forge Strategic AI Partnership to Transform European Telecom Services
Nvidia Nears $20 Billion OpenAI Investment as AI Funding Race Intensifies
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock
OpenAI Reportedly Eyes Late-2026 IPO Amid Rising Competition and Massive Funding Needs
SpaceX Updates Starlink Privacy Policy to Allow AI Training as xAI Merger Talks and IPO Loom
Meta Stock Surges After Q4 2025 Earnings Beat and Strong Q1 2026 Revenue Outlook Despite Higher Capex
Palantir Stock Jumps After Strong Q4 Earnings Beat and Upbeat 2026 Revenue Forecast
Nvidia’s $100 Billion OpenAI Investment Faces Internal Doubts, Report Says 



