After a seven-year legal battle, the jury has decided that Apple is entitled to a $539 million payment in damages over a patent infringement case against their top smartphone industry rival, Samsung.
The said amount covers damages on infringed patent designs of three smartphone parts and of two Apple facilities.
The decision, announced on Thursday, was the latest verdict in a series of re-trials for the said lawsuit originally filed by the iPhone maker in 2011. The latest trial was meant to determine, once and for all, the damages Samsung owes.
Naturally, Samsung expressed dismay over the jury’s verdict saying (via Bloomberg), “Today’s decision flies in the face of a unanimous Supreme Court ruling in favor of Samsung on the scope of design patent damages.” Samsung also implied that they will continue pursuing other legal actions to reach “an outcome that does not hinder creativity and fair competition for all companies and consumers.”
Meanwhile, Apple maintained that seeking a favorable jury decision, for them, goes beyond the sum of money they will receive. “We believe deeply in the value of design, and our teams work tirelessly to create innovative products that delight our customers,” the company added.
The latest trial, led by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh, was installed to determine the equivalent amount of damages based on Samsung’s sales from the infringed products. But before this, the court first needed to determine the “articles of manufacture” in this particular infringement case.
Apple maintained that the rightful articles of manufacture include the entire Samsung smartphone models where the patents in question were applied, thus, damages to be paid should be up to $1 billion — as stated in their original filing.
On the other hand, Samsung argued that the articles of manufacture are just the individual parts — including round-cornered glass front panel, round bezels surrounding the front and phone screen — and suggested that the compensation should only play around $28 million.
As indicated in the jury decision form (via CNET), the jurors priced the damages based on the patent designs’ sales on 16 Samsung products.
In 2012, a different set of jury granted Apple’s demands of $1 billion in damages. However, the Supreme Court reversed this decision bringing the amount down to $399 million. Later, the case was brought back to the district court circuit to determine the articles of manufacture which led to this week’s verdict.


Palantir Stock Jumps After Strong Q4 Earnings Beat and Upbeat 2026 Revenue Forecast
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
SpaceX Updates Starlink Privacy Policy to Allow AI Training as xAI Merger Talks and IPO Loom
Oracle Plans $45–$50 Billion Funding Push in 2026 to Expand Cloud and AI Infrastructure
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
Jerome Powell Attends Supreme Court Hearing on Trump Effort to Fire Fed Governor, Calling It Historic
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District 



