Germany decriminalised cannabis: why the UK should consider doing the same 
Parliament passes bill declaring Rwanda safe – but can it really be called a law at all? 
Georgia is sliding towards autocracy after government moves to force through bill on ‘foreign agents’ 
Lawsuit Against Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley Over Archegos Collapse Dismissed by US Judge 
How the UK’s new rights around flexible working will affect employees and businesses 
EU enlargement: What does the future hold? 
Why Africa can be the beating heart of South Korea’s technology industry 
Crypto.com's Launch in South Korea Stalled by AML Regulatory Concerns, Postponement Announced 
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Pushes for AI Policy on Capitol Hill Visit After Middle East Tour 
Digital trade protocol for Africa: why it matters, what’s in it and what’s still missing 
New IRS Crypto Tax Form: What Your Broker Will Report Next Year 
Canada Set to Enforce OECD Crypto Tax Standards by 2026 
Why is the London Stock Exchange losing out to the US 
How India’s economy has fared under ten years of Narendra Modi 
Vladimir Putin’s gold strategy explains why sanctions against Russia have failed 
New York City customers sued the US chicken chain Chick-fil-A for deceptively and untruthfully pricing its menu for delivery.
The proposed class-action suit alleged that Chick-fil-A had advertised flat delivery fees on orders of $2.99 or $3.99 but secretly marks up the prices by 25 to 30 percent.
The two plaintiffs pointed out that a 30-piece chicken nuggets order costs $5 to $6 more when ordered for delivery than for pickup, or ordered in-store.
According to the plaintiffs, the "secret" additional delivery markup is essentially a "hidden delivery fee" deceiving consumers into making purchases they otherwise would not make.
While setting different pricing for delivery is common among restaurants, the lawsuit insists these should be disclosed.
The plaintiffs are seeking an order for Chick-fil-A to end this alleged practice and financial compensation.
