Menu

Search

  |   Entertainment

Menu

  |   Entertainment

Search

Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Used Money To Stop Justin Theroux from Revealing Her Dark Secrets

Photo by: Dave Mathews/Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Jennifer Aniston reportedly wants her ex-husband Justin Theroux to keep silent about their marriage. It was said that the “Friends” star is willing to pay her ex so he will not reveal her dark secrets to the public.

According to Radar Online, Justin Theroux warned Jennifer Aniston that he will speak out if she will not be fair when talking about their relationship. It was said that the actor told his ex-wife that he will not hesitate to tell-all if she will talk unfairly and spill dirt on their separation.

It was added that Justin Theroux promised that his tell-all will put Jennifer Aniston in “utter humiliation” so she must be careful. The source supposedly told the magazine, “This isn’t Justin’s style but he figures he needs options if Jen fights dirty. If he did go on TV or give an interview that delved into their failed marriage he’d have so much to say about his own frustrations that otherwise won’t be aired.”

Now, to stop her ex from revealing her dirty secrets, Jen allegedly expressed her willingness to write a check in exchange for his silence. It was stated that the actress wants to meet with Justin Theroux so they can talk it out and have a deal before things get out of hand.

“Technically there’s nothing to stop Justin from speaking out, and Jen wants to remedy that before it becomes a temptation,” the source said.

But then again, Gossip Cop revealed that this is a false story. It contradicted the report because it does not sound convincing due to the lack of details like how much money is involved and what kind of dark secrets that Justin Theroux is revealing that made Jennifer Aniston so concerned.

Lastly, GC mentioned that the tipster who alleged that Jennifer Aniston is offering hush money to stop Justin Theroux from talking about their marriage and her nasty secrets may not even exist because they could not trace her or him. the source does not have a name as well so this made it all the more convincing that the report was made up.

  • Market Data
Close

Welcome to EconoTimes

Sign up for daily updates for the most important
stories unfolding in the global economy.