Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
 (VEON) - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Sept. 25, 2017 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces Class Action update regarding VEON, Ltd. (“VEON” or the Company”) (NASDAQ:VEON), previously known as VimpelCom, Ltd.
On December 9, 2016, Lead Plaintiff in the action filed an amended class action complaint. The amended complaint asserts claims on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased VimpelCom securities (now VEON) between December 4, 2010 and November 3, 2015 inclusive (the “Class Period”), and seeks to pursue violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10(b)-5 promulgated thereunder. Recently, the Court issued an important decision which denied the Company’s attempt to dismiss the class action. In particular, the Court’s decision denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss and sustained most of the claims in the amended class action complaint.
A copy of the amended class action complaint and the Court’s decision can be found at our website at www.gme-law.com.
If you wish to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
