Huawei's Covert US Funding Scheme Raises Eyebrows Amid Export Ban 
Samsung Chief Lee Jae-yong Wraps Up Europe Visit, Includes Vatican and Zeiss 
To make AI safe, governments must regulate data collection 
Bitfinex CTO Deems Database Breach Claims 'Fake' Amidst Hacker Allegations 
Bitcoin Surges Over $63K Amid Revitalized ETF Interest 
Altcoin Market Rally Predicted, Analysts Forecast $4 Trillion Market Cap Surge 
Tesla's Supercharger Shake-up Sparks Chaos: Suppliers in Limbo Over Email Directive 
Bitcoin's Next Bull Run Hinges on Key Trading Pattern Confirmation: Analysts 
Samsung's Galaxy S25 Rumored to Boost Longevity with 'Battery AI' 
Shiba Inu Coin Rockets as Burn Rate Skyrockets 1000% Amidst Market Rally 
Coinbase Faces New Lawsuit Alleging Investor Deception in Digital Asset Sales 
Shiba Inu's Remarkable 12% Surge Fueled by Record SHIB Burns, Community Momentum 
Crypto.com's F1 Sponsorship Expansion Sparks Global Visibility Drive 
Tesla Enhances Model Y Lineup with Longer-Range Variant, Price Adjustment 
Bitcoin Thrives: Whales Accumulate Over 47K BTC Amidst Price Rally 
Leak: Huawei's Kirin PC Chip, Qingyun Notebooks to Launch Next Month 
SHIB, BONK, WIF's Sudden Price Jumps; What's Behind Them? 
Even though the Exynos 2400 trails the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in synthetic benchmark tests by a small margin, the two CPUs appear to be neck and neck in real-world gaming settings.
Exynos 2400 Can Keep Up With Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 In Actual Games
NL Tech compared the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3-powered Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra versus the Exynos 2400-powered Samsung Galaxy S24+ with a variety of popular Android games to determine whether there was any difference.
The results are pretty startling, to say the least. The two devices performed similarly in Genshin Impact, PUBG Mobile, Mobile Legends, and Fortnite. In Gehnshin, the two chips maintained approximately 60fps; in PUBG Mobile at Smooth graphics settings, the two maintained 90fps; and in Fortnite, the consistent frame rate was around 90fps, occasionally decreasing to 70fps during fighting.
NL Tech found a substantial difference in only two games: "Call of Duty: Mobile" and "War Thunder." During the former, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 maintained 120fps throughout the game, however the Exynos 2400 was limited to 60fps for some reason.
In "War Thunder," however, the Exynos 2400 surpassed Qualcomm's solution by sustaining a frame rate of roughly 100fps while the Snapdragon throttled to 40. It's worth noting that "War Thunder" supports ray tracing. Therefore, these findings indicate that Exynos' Xclipse 940 GPU is better suited to handling ray tracing visuals, as per GSMArena.
Exynos 2400's Thermal Efficiency: Bridging Performance with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in Galaxy S24 Series
It's vital to remember a few things here. First, the testing was conducted on pre-production handsets, and second, they are two distinct phones. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is said to have a better cooling solution, including a larger heat sink.
Other factors may be at play in this case. It would be intriguing to see a Samsung Galaxy S24+ with Exynos competing with its Snapdragon-powered sibling.
What's fantastic about the Exynos 2400 is that it doesn't overheat like previous-generation Exynos chips, and the temperatures of the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Samsung Galaxy S24+ look to be comparable to those of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.
The Exynos 2400 performed similarly to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 For Galaxy inside the Galaxy S24 Ultra, both in terms of frame rates and temperatures. It could be a mix of the Exynos 2400's enhanced design, the newer Xclipse 940 GPU (based on AMD RDNA3), Samsung Foundry's third-generation 4nm chip production process, and a larger vapor chamber cooling system.
Photo: NL Tech/YouTube Screenshot
