Qualcomm Responds to Snapdragon X Elite Benchmark Cheating Claims

Qualcomm has responded to the serious allegations that it cheated on performance benchmarks for its Snapdragon X Elite and Plus chips, targeting competition with leading laptop processors.

According to Tom's Hardware, Qualcomm has now reacted to SemiAccurate's allegations that it is manipulating the benchmarks for its new Snapdragon X Elite and Plus laptop CPUs.

Snapdragon X Elite Benchmark Controversy Explained

The Snapdragon X Plus, unveiled yesterday, is the latest addition to Qualcomm's planned array of processors for Windows notebooks, joining the already-announced X Elite. The chips are notable for being Qualcomm's first laptop processor that may compete with Apple, Intel, and AMD and the greatest opportunity for Windows on Arm to gain traction.

SemiAccurate asserts that Qualcomm has not been honest about the carefully selected benchmark results it has published with the media. Citing information from two major OEMs and a deep Qualcomm source, the tech blog divulged, "The benchmarks were cheats, told us how they were cooked, and told us that Qualcomm was well aware of it."

Qualcomm Responds to Snapdragon X Elite Benchmark Scandal

Responding to these allegations, a Qualcomm representative affirmed the company's confidence in their product's performance, stating, "We stand behind our performance claims and are excited for consumers to get their hands on Snapdragon X Elite and X Plus devices soon."

The public first saw the X Elite processors' benchmarks at Qualcomm's Snapdragon Summit conference in October last year. These figures, which SemiAccurate's sources said were clean, were slower than anticipated; however, the Qualcomm source stated that the software was still in development.

Furthermore, those benchmarks were a mystery to everyone at the conference; imprecise charts comparing performance against rivals Apple and Intel could not be independently verified.

OEMs Report Snapdragon X Elite Underperforms Expectations

As per Wccftech, several OEMs reported seeing results that were "far sub-50%" of Qualcomm's claims. When asked about this discrepancy in performance, the engineers at the chipset manufacturer pointed the finger at inadequate cooling and Windows's poor optimization on ARM silicon.

Even after these OEMs fixed the cooling issue, the Snapdragon X Elite performed poorly compared to Qualcomm's most recent findings. According to an anonymous source, the newest SoC performs appallingly well, likened to an Intel Celeron processor. However, SemiAccurate did not bother to display the outcomes that these unidentified OEMs were able to achieve.

Qualcomm's reputation will be severely damaged if the first retail units do not function as anticipated.

Qualcomm Newsroom