Milei Threatens Falkland Oil Firms With Sanctions 
Shein Shares Drop 5% After Weak Hong Kong IPO Debut 
South Korea Weighs Military Support for Strait of Hormuz Security 
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief 
US Oil Blockade Deepens Iran’s Economic Crisis 
Anthropic Nears $15 Billion Credit Deal Ahead of IPO 
OpenAI Rejects Apple Trade Secret Theft Claims 
Lenovo Shares Fall After Dropbox Security Breach Exposes ID Vulnerability 
New Mexico Sues DOJ Over Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein Files Amid Ongoing Investigation 
GSM Eyes US, Europe Expansion Ahead of 2028 Hong Kong IPO 
Lynas Rare Earths Shares Rise After Takeover Talks Revealed 
Yindjibarndi Appeals Fortescue Mining Compensation Ruling 
Nvidia Eyes $2.5 Billion Investment in Thinking Machines Lab 
Tesla Cybercab Rides Launch in Austin as NHTSA Reviews Rollout 
Pacific Leaders Raise Alarm Over China Missile Test as Nauru Dissents 
Two Palestinian Teenagers Killed in West Bank Violence 
Audi, SAIC Launch China Innovation Hub for New AUDI Models 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The New York Times has asked a federal court to block grand jury subpoenas issued to three of its journalists following their reporting on President Donald Trump’s new Qatari-donated Air Force One, escalating a legal battle over press freedom and national security leaks.
According to the newspaper, the subpoenas were issued last Friday by Jay Clayton, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, shortly after the publication reported that the new Air Force One lacked several security features found on the existing presidential aircraft. The reporters were instructed to appear before a federal grand jury in Manhattan on Wednesday.
The New York Times argues that the subpoenas are an attempt to retaliate against the newspaper for its reporting rather than a legitimate investigative step. David McCraw, the company’s senior vice president and deputy general counsel, said the publication is seeking court intervention to protect its journalists and uphold the public’s right to independent reporting.
In a statement, McCraw said the newspaper believes the subpoenas were issued in bad faith and are intended to punish the organization for covering a matter of significant public interest. He added that the legal challenge is aimed at defending reporters’ ability to gather and publish news without government intimidation.
The dispute comes as Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told a U.S. Senate panel that the three journalists are not the targets of any criminal investigation. Instead, he said, federal authorities are attempting to identify individuals who may have leaked sensitive national security information related to the presidential aircraft.
McCraw has also requested that the court unseal the newspaper’s legal filing, arguing that the public deserves transparency regarding the case and the government’s actions.
The case is expected to intensify the ongoing debate over the balance between protecting classified information and safeguarding press freedom, particularly when reporting involves national security and the Trump administration.
